Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter?
By Gary R. Pike, John C. Smart, George D. Kuh, John C. Hayek. 2006
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74236339680aa69bff57df74d0138048f7291e2f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- George D. Kuh
- Gary R. Pike
- K. Webber
- L. Leach
- N. Zepke
- Alexander C. McCormick
- John C. Smart
- C. Ethington
Citations in the corpus
- Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action (2010, background): “But even more important than the money spent on support services is the institutional culture – it must emphasize the support of learning (Pike et al., 2006; Porter, 2006).”
- If and When Money Matters: The Relationships Among Educational Expenditures, Student Engagement and Students’ Learning Outcomes (2011, methodology): “In the conceptual model, the paths from institutional characteristics (including expenditures) to student engagement and from student engagement to learning outcomes represent the indirect relationships between educational expenditures and learning outcomes (see Kuh et al. 2007; Pike et al. 2006; ”
- Student and Faculty Member Engagement in Undergraduate Research (2013, result): “We agree with Pike et al. (2006) that institutional expenditures can make a difference in positive outcomes, and believe our findings reaffirm the need for institution officials to continue allocation of resources for in-class and co-curricular discovery-based learning activities.”