Student engagement literature review
By Vicki Trowler. 2010
1,078 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6d0c5f9444fc4e92cca76fe9f426bd107e837a9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Laurenz Langer
- Michelle Hood
- Maria Hvid Stenalt
- Peter A. Creed
- Janice S Tripney
- Berit Lassesen
- Elisabeth M. French
- L. Leach
Citations in the corpus
- The Science of Using Science: Researching the Use of Research Evidence in Decision-Making (2016, background): “Stevenson et al 2015; Ahonen & Moore 2005; Hollebeek 2011; Schaufeli 2013) The importance of engagement, too, is cited to increase student motivation in the educational literature (Naghavi 2015; Trowler 2010).”
- Working while studying at university: The relationship between work benefits and demands and engagement and well-being (2015, background): “For a review of outcomes of engagement see Trowler (2010).”
- The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention (2013, background): “Engagement, or activity, however, is an ambiguous concept (Trowler, 2010), and this section describes what is meant by engagement in this particular study.”
- Student engagement: students' and teachers' perceptions (2014, background): “Various literature syntheses from the USA (Kuh, Kinzie, Buckley, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006), the UK (Trowler, 2010), Australia (James, Krause, & Jennings, 2010) and Aotearoa New Zealand (Zepke & Leach, 2010) identify key factors in engaging students, such as motivation, the role of teachers, institutio”
- Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research (2021, background): “These studies adopt a more critical perspective, focus on behaviours that can be framed as negative expressions of student engagement (Trowler 2010), and corroborate that agency in higher education extends academic goals and includes a learner with a history (Ashwin 2009).”
- Student Ownership of Learning as a Key Component of College Readiness (2014, background): “Engagement can be thought of as comprising three components: behavioral engagement (compliance with norms and expectations), emotional engagement (interest, enjoyment), and cognitive engagement (investment in learning, challenge-seeking; Fredricks, Blumenfield, & Paris, 2004; Trowler, 2010).”
- Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university (2019, background): “…to investigate students’ experiences in teaching and learning, and points out there has been little peer-reviewed research on student engagement in the UK, where the studies are mostly in the form of grey literature (e.g. small, single case studies) like much of the American research (2010, 3).”
- Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions (2020, unknown): “In general, student engagement has three dimensions: behavioural, cognitive, and emotional (Klem & Connell, 2004; Smith, Sheppard, Johnson, & Johnson, 2005; Tinio, 2009; Trowler, 2010).”
- The use of Edmodo in teaching writing in a blended learning setting (2016, background): “Those observed facts, to Coates (2007) in Trowler (2010) indicate students’ involvement in academic activities to enrich their schooling experience.”