Proactive, Early Screening to Detect Behaviorally At-Risk Students: Issues, Approaches, Emerging Innovations, and Professional Practices.

By H. Severson, H. Walker, Jennifer Hope-Doolittle, Thomas Kratochwill, F. Gresham. 2007

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e7218404ee86543089a70a69897f1fba29bf2ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

A Critical Review of Five Commonly Used Social-Emotional and Behavioral Screeners for Elementary or Secondary Schools (2014, background): “The SSBD is a well-researched, highly regarded school-wide screening tool that can be used to identify students at risk for internalizing and externalizing behaviors (Severson et al. 2007).”
Service Delivery for Response to Intervention: Core Components and Directions for Future Research (2007, methodology): “Additional empirical support for the effective use of databased criteria for student classification or screening (e.g., Glover & Albers, 2007; Severson et al., 2007) and progress monitoring (e.g., Espin, Scierka, Skare, & Halverson, 1999; Espin & Tindal, 1998; Marston et al., 1984) is also…”
School-Based Behavioral Assessment Within Problem-Solving Models: Current Status and Future Directions (2010, background): “A long history of work regarding a multiple gating approach is available (e.g., Severson et al., 2007), and an adaptive model that uses multiple gating procedures to integrate these three levels of objectives has been proposed recently (e.g., Volpe, Briesch, & Chafouleas, in press).”
General Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Behavior Management and Intervention Strategies (2010, methodology): “…in regular education due to the implementation of response to intervention (RTI), which was required by special education law (Albers, Glover, & Kratochwill, 2007; Gresham, 2004, 2005; Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act Regulations, n.d.; Reschly, 2004; Severson et al., 2007).”