NAILING DOWN GOSSAMER: A VALID MEASURE OF THE PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT OF WORKPLACE SPIRITUALITY.

By M. Sheep. 2004

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7898c51999ca06c6516750bdcf68352f82822160

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Health

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

An Examination of Proxy Measures of Workplace Spirituality: A Profile Model of Multidimensional Constructs (2006, methodology): “These measures were chosen after synthesis of many studies attempting development of measures of spirituality through both empirical and qualitative means (Greenwald & Harder, 2003; Milliman et al., 2003; Mitroff & Denton, 1999; Sheep, 2004).”
Spirituality in the Workplace: Theory and Measurement (2011, unknown): “Numerous conceptual definitions and several measurements of spirituality that can be used in management research have been proposed (e.g., Ashmos & Duchon, 2000; Benefiel, 2003; Conger, 1994; Fornaciari, Sherlock, Ritchie, & Dean, 2005; Freshman, 1999; Giacalone & Jurkiewicz, 2003; Heaton, Schmidt-W”
Some of the Recent Organizational Behavior Concepts as Precursors to Workplace Spirituality (2009, background): “Years ago, Selznick (1948) described organizations as rational expressions of instrumental action.”
The what, why, and how of spirituality in the workplace revisited: a 14-year update and extension (2016, background): “Next, workplace spirituality researchers have examined OCB, which involves extra-role behaviors beyond basic job duties, as a possible outcome of workplace spirituality.”
The relationship between workplace spirituality and innovative work behavior: the mediating role of perceived person–organization fit (2015, background): “Sheep (2004) investigated the relationship of employees’ workplace spirituality with organizational commitment and performance by using perceived P–”
Creating organizational conditions that foster employee spirit at work (2006, unknown): “Although Sheep (2004) puts forth a compelling argument for the existence of conceptual convergence, Kinjerski and Skrypnek provide the only empirically grounded definition: Spirit at work is a distinct state that is characterized by cognitive, interpersonal, spiritual, and mystical dimensions.”