Recent Developments in Technology and Language Learning: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis
By Yong Zhao. 2013
371 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/739dbbe60a23a4e0f380d2123b11331036850350
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Steve Graham
- Paul Morphy
- Rana M. Tamim
- Eugene F. Borokhovski
- Philip C. Abrami
- Robert M. Bernard
- Richard F. Schmid
- M. Gu
In Language and Linguistics
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Paul Morphy
- M. Gu
- Chun Lai
- M. Avgousti
- Chin-Hsi Lin
- C. Anne Wade
- Rana M. Tamim
- Eugene F. Borokhovski
Citations in the corpus
- Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology (2011, background): “…on technology-enhanced language learning has attested to the various facets of the power of technology for language learning (Chapelle, 2010; Zhao, 2003), and these educational potentials are expected both to enhance language instruction inside the classroom and to extend language education…”
- Review of Studies on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning and Teaching (2020, methodology): “The finding related to the effectiveness of technology application to support language learning and instruction is in line with earlier review studies because Duman et al. [7], Ghanizadeh et al. [2], Golonka et al. [3], Shadiev et al. [8], and Zhao [7] reported similar results.”
- Learning in One-to-One Laptop Environments (2016, methodology): “This database provides broad coverage of journals in the field of educational technology and is frequently used in meta-analyses (e.g., Lin, Huang, & Liou, 2013; Zhao, 2003).”
- The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review (2018, background): “Zhao (2013) supported the above view and said that access to authentic materials in the target language is critical for successful language learning.”
- Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: a meta-analysis of research findings (2012, methodology): “More specifically, reference lists of prior meta-analyses of word processing effects (i.e., Bangert-Drowns, 1993; Goldberg et al., 2003; Graham & Perin, 2007a) and related qualitative syntheses of word processing effects (e.g., Penuel, 2006; Zhao, 2001 ) were searched.”
- Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: a systematic review (2018, background): “…(Abraham, 2008; Lin, 2014; Lin, Huang, & Liou, 2013; Macaro, Handley, & Walter, 2011; Sauro, 2011; Taylor, 2006, 2009; Wang & V asquez, 2012; Zhao, 2003), and most of them belong to the meta-analyses strand (Abraham, 2008; Lin, 2014; Lin et al., 2013; Taylor, 2006, 2009; Zhao, 2003), with…”
- Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning: What Does the Research Tell Us? (2012, background): “…reviewed research on computer-based technology use from 1990 to 2000; Stockwell (2007), who organized his review of technologies by language skill area and surveyed research from 2001 through 2005; and Zhao (2003), who investigated technology developments and language learning from 1997 to 2001.”
- The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications (2014, background): “Zhao (2003) looks at Instructional Communication Technologies (ICTs) and two meta-analyses, Michko (2007) and Schmid et al. (2009), examine the breadth of technologies used in postsecondary education.”