Time in organizational research: Catching up on a long neglected topic in order to improve theory

By Sabine Sonnentag. 2012

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6123d4ce5421b795a4f25b4ae6199ae6e2f7296a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Time in Individual-Level Organizational Studies: What is it, How is it Used, and Why Isn't it Exploited More Often? (2015, background): “As a result, it is not surprising that scholars have repeatedly suggested that the adoption of a temporal lens is essential for the advancement of organizational science (e.g., Ancona et al. 2001a,b; Bluedorn 2002; George & Jones 2000;McGrath&Rotchford 1983; Roe 2008; Sonnentag 2012).”
Daily within-person effects of job autonomy and work engagement on innovative behaviour: The cross-level moderating role of creative self-efficacy (2017, background): “Thus, we provide an integrated answer to calls for taking both individual differences (Ford, 1996; Janssen, 2005) and short-term processes (Sonnentag, 2012; Spector & Meier, 2014) into account.”
Play at Work: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research (2018, background): “Recently, organizational scholars have suggested that understanding when things take place is crucial to making sense of organizational phenomena (Mitchell & James, 2001; Shipp & Cole, 2015; Sonnentag, 2012).”
Does job crafting always lead to employee well-being and performance? Meta-analytical evidence on the moderating role of societal culture (2020, background): “Previous studies have acknowledged the relevance of time perspectives in the domains of organizational psychology (Sonnentag, 2012) and work design (Steel & Konig, 2006).”
The influence of future time perspective on work engagement and job performance: the role of job crafting (2017, unknown): “Hence, researchers are starting to acknowledge that time, and particularly perceptions of that time that also change with age, plays an important role in work and organizational psychology (Sonnentag, 2012).”
Revisiting followership through a social identity perspective: the role of collective follower emotion and action (2013, background): “…& Moreland, 2004; Burke, Stagl, Salas, Pierce, & Kendall, 2006; Hackman, 2012; Marks, Mathieu, & Zaccaro, 2001), temporal perspectives have recently emerged in the group dynamics literature and in the leadership and organization literature (e.g., Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011, Sonnentag, 2012).”
Scientific Contributions of Within-Person Research in Management: Making the Juice Worth the Squeeze (2018, background): “Conventional, between-person research shows how individuals differ from one another and has not fully addressed time (Ancona, Goodman, Lawrence, & Tushman, 2001; Monge, 1990; Pitariu & Ployhart, 2010; Sonnentag, 2012).”
What Have We Learned That Is Critical in Understanding Leadership Perceptions and Leader-Performance Relations? (2014, background): “These dynamic processes led organizational scholars to consider the importance of time (Bluedorn & Jaussi, 2008; Sonnentag, 2012), complexity in self and interpersonal processes (Uhl-Bien, Marion, & McKelvey, 2007), and adaptability to meet the needs of complex environments as processes evolve with…”
Episodes of incivility between subordinates and supervisors: Examining the role of self‐control and time with an interaction‐record diary study. (2015, background): “Third, we respond to the call to study the temporal dynamics in organizational research (e.g., George & Jones, 2000; Sonnentag, 2012) by examining the role of time in the relationship between experienced and instigated incivility.”