Do Bilinguals Activate Phonological Representations in One or Both of Their Languages When Naming Words

By Debra Jared, Judith F. Kroll. 2001

448 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f67f063872b8008ec50253e9e30c9ebb8f026f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech (2006, result): “The few studies that have attempted to deliberately manipulate language mode have met with mixed results (e.g. Dijkstra, De Bruijn, Schriefers and Ten Brinke, 2000; Jared and Kroll, 2001; Van Hell and Dijkstra, 2002).”
Juggling Two Languages in One Mind (2008, result): “The parallel activation of the bilingual’s two languages also has the consequence of creating cross-language interactions that are bidirectional, with the L2 influencing the L1 in a similar manner to the way that the L1 influences the L2 (e.g., Dussias, 2003a; Jared & Kroll, 2001).”
Second Language Proficiency and Cross-Language Lexical Activation (2012, background): “…that their knowledge of French was important, by having them read French words prior to the L1 English lexical decision task (as also observed in Jared & Kroll, 2001; Jared & Szucs, 2002) or by increasing the amount of French distractors by replacing the pseudowords (requiring a “no”-response…”
Cognitive Processes in Second Language Learners and Bilinguals: The Development of Lexical and Conceptual Representations (2008, methodology): “Other recent studies have shown that not only orthographic but also phonological features of the nontarget language are activated during word recognition (e.g., Brysbaert, Van Dyck, and Van de Poel, 1999; Dijkstra, Grainger, and Van Heuven, 1999; Jared and Kroll, 2001).”
Morphological insensitivity in second language processing (2004, background): “…been well demonstrated in research findings such as the Stroop effect (Stroop, 1935), the nonselective activation of multiple meanings of homophones in biased context (e.g., Swinney, 1979), and the nonselective activation of both languages in a monolingual task in bilinguals (Jared & Kroll, 2001).”
Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing☆ (2015, methodology): “Productive vocabulary knowledge, as an estimate of vocabulary size, was assessed using a picture naming task (Jared & Kroll, 2001).”
The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision (2002, result): “This is in line with several recent studies demonstrating profoundly language non-selective effects with respect to all three codes (e.g., Dijkstra, Grainger and Van Heuven, 1999; Jared and Kroll, 2001).”
Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. (2008, unknown): “... the underlying reason for the bilingual disadvantage in lexical retrieval, substantial agreement exists that there is parallel activation of both languages when bilinguals are using one of them (Beauvillain & Grainger, 1987; Brysbaert, Van Dyck, & Van de Poel, 1999; Colome´, 2001; Costa, 2005; D”
What causes the bilingual disadvantage in verbal fluency?: The dual-task analogy (2010, background): “As noted above, in some cases bilinguals show evidence of non-dominant language activation only immediately after being tested in a non-dominant-language-only block (Jared and Kroll, 2001).”
Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming (2002, methodology): “The Language Experience Questionnaire, developed by Jared and Kroll (2001) was also used.”
Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context (2006, background): “... access similarly apply across multiple languages? Similar to monolingual research, the majority of studies on bilingual word recognition have demonstrated that there is non-selective access of lexical information across a bilingual’s two languages in out-ofcontext tasks (e.g., Brysbaert, 1998; D”
More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. (2008, background): “In some studies, L2 (the less-dominant language) interfered with L1 (the dominant language) only after L2 was first activated by a task exclusively in L2 (Jared & Kroll, 2001).”
Language switching and language competition (2012, result): “Similarly, other studies have shown that bilinguals activate spelling to sound correspondences in a non-target language that compete during word naming in a target language (e.g. Jared and Kroll, 2001).”
Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts (2002, methodology): “Heuven, 1999; Dijkstra, Van Jaarsveld, & Ten Brinke, 1998;Gollan, Forster, & Frost, 1997; Grainger & Beauvillain, 1987; Grainger & Frenck-Mestre, 1998; Jared & Kroll, 2001; Jiang, 1999;Nas, 1983;Van Hell & De Groot, 1998; Van Heuven, Dijkstra, & Grainger, 1998).”
Linguistic diversity and object naming by non-native speakers of English (2003, background): “In addition, research on lexical retrieval in bilinguals (e.g., Kroll and Curley, 1988; Kroll and Stewart, 1994) suggests that such learners access words in the second language lexicon through their links to words in the native lexicon.”
Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages (2007, methodology): “Recently there have been a number of studies that have examined cross-language activation in tasks such as word naming, which require selection of the full phonological code in order to produce the appropriate response (Jared & Kroll, 2001; Jared & Szucs, 2002).”