Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts

By Janet G. van Hell, Ton Dijkstra. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2002

604 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e18ac35e42fd72dca3b52e79c773051b3239ed8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading (2011, background): “showed semantic priming from L1 primes, but only in the first block of the experiment and only for participants who saw a German movie prior to the experiment. From this, the authors argued that cross-lingual priming from L1 to L2 was weak because of constraints imposed by the sentence. Studies by V”
Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service (2010, background): “Other strong evidence for the influence of foreign language knowledge on native language performance was reported by van Hell and Dijkstra (2002). These authors asked trilinguals with Dutch as their native and dominant language (L1), English as their second language (L2), and French as their third l”
How bilinguals solve the naming problem (2005, background): “Other cross-language semantic priming studies (e.g., Altarriba, 1992; Chen & Ng, 1989; Kroll & Curley, 1988; Williams, 1994) as well as evidence from picture naming and translation tasks (Potter, So, Von Eckhardt, & Feldman, 1984), word and picture identification and classification (Shanon, 1982), a”
Perceived foreign accent in first language attrition and second language acquisition: The impact of age of acquisition and bilingualism (2011, background): “…in bilinguals have been well documented in cognitive processing (e.g., Bialystok, 2009) and linguistic processing at different levels (e.g., van Hell & Dijkstra, 2002, for the bilingual mental lexicon; Hernandez, Bates, & Avila, 1994, for sentence processing; Cutler, Mehler, Norris, & Segui,…”
Testing the Language Mode Hypothesis Using Trilinguals (2003, methodology): “In our view, the available evidence does not provide strong evidence in favour of mode shifts in the word recognition of relatively L2-fluent but still unbalanced Dutch–English bilinguals (Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 2002).”
Bilingual Minds (2009, background): “A study by van Hell and Dijkstra (2002) using lexical-decision and word-association tasks showed that high level of proficiency even in an L3 can influence processing speed in the dominant language.”
Cross-linguistic structural priming in multilinguals: further evidence for shared syntax (2016, background): “However, multilingualism offers the possibility of comparing cross-linguistic influences between a first and second language with influences between two different second languages (see Lemhöfer, Dijkstra, & Michel, 2004; Van Hell & Dijkstra, 2002 for such studies in the lexical domain).”
Early bilingualism, language transfer, and phonological awareness (2007, background): “…of bilingual memory (French & Jacquet, 2004) and also the assumption of nonselective linguistic access (i.e., the assumption that linguistic structures in both languages may be accessed simultaneously; de Groot, Delmaar, & Lupker, 2000; French & Jacquet, 2004; van Hell & Dijkstra, 2002).”
Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context (2006, background): “... on bilingual word recognition have demonstrated that there is non-selective access of lexical information across a bilingual’s two languages in out-ofcontext tasks (e.g., Brysbaert, 1998; De Bruijn et al., 2001; De Groot & Keijzer, 2000; Dijkstra, Timmermans, & Schriefers, 2000; Dijkstra & Van H”
Parallel language activation during word processing in bilinguals: Evidence from word production in sentence context* (2013, background): “These studies typically find that cognates are processed faster and more accurately than noncognates (e.g., Dijkstra et al., 1998; Dijkstra et al., 1999; Gollan, Forster & Frost, 1997; Schwartz, Kroll & Diaz, 2007; Van Hell & Dijkstra, 2002).”
Second Language Proficiency and Cross-Language Lexical Activation (2012, background): “We specifically focus on three paradigms that have been used relatively frequently to address the role of L2 proficiency in lexical activation: cognate and homograph processing in visual word perception and word production, auditory word perception using the visual world paradigm, and cross-language”
Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition (2011, background): “Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. & Diependaele, K. (2009).”
WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French (2004, methodology): “…elaborate and less accurate assessment strategies of neighborhood size which are often used in studies in these languages, such as asking a number of independent participants to name as many neighbors as possible of the items that will be used in the experiment (e.g., Van Hell & Dijkstra, 2002).”