The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision

By Ton Dijkstra, Walter van Heuven. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2002

1,529 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f65380232593c83fce5e2ac6cebdcd1cdc89ca9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Emotional activation in the first and second language (2007, background): “Some authors suggest that lexical representations from both languages are stored within a unitary system and that language-specific lexical selection occurs late in visual word recognition (ie, Dijkstra & van Heuven, 2002 ), while others are proposing separate lexical stores for each language (ie, ”
Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? (2004, background): “Words are also tagged for their language (Spanish or English), by being linked to a ‘‘Spanish’’ or ‘‘English’’ language node ( Dijkstra & Van Heuven, 2002; Van Heuven et al., 1998).”
The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation (2004, methodology): “For example, models such as the BIA (Dijkstra, Van Heuven and Grainger, 1998) or BIA+ ( Dijkstra and Van Heuven, 2002 ) characterize the process whereby a visually-presented word is recognized.”
The dynamics of bilingual lexical access (2006, background): “Note that this channeling of activation is possible because, unlike in other domains such as word reading (see Dijkstra and Van Heuven, 2002 for an extensive discussion), the choice of the language in which the message needs to be conveyed depends entirely on the speaker’s intention.”
Is language control just a form of executive control? Evidence for overlapping processes in language switching and task switching☆☆☆ (2017, positive): “Interestingly, Gollan et al. (2014) implemented identical response modalities (vocal) to respond to the naming task for LS and to the read/add or size/parity task for TS, and observed positive weak to moderate correlations (Evans, 1996) between switch cost of the dominant language and task-switch co”
FREQUENCY OF INPUT AND L2 COLLOCATIONAL PROCESSING (2013, methodology): “This view is captured in models of word recognition such as the bilingual interactive activation (BIA) and BIA+ models (Dijkstra & van Heuven, 1998 , 2002 ), and the term often used to describe this cross-language activation is ballistic (Phillips, Segalowitz, O’Brien, & Yamasaki, 2004 ), meaning…”
Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English (2010, background): “Finally, we were unable to look at cross-linguistic relationships, yet there is evidence from work with adult bilinguals that indeed word recognition processes in bilinguals are influenced by both underlying language systems (e.g., Dijkstra & van Heuven, 2002; Koda, 1996; Wang & Koda, 2007).”