Cultural Dimensions at the Individual Level of Analysis

By Martha L. Maznevski, Carolina Gómez, J. DiStefano, Niels Noorderhaven, Pei-Chuan Wu. 2002

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Communication, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5eb7b450570765146bde0d2b00bbbb11129ae8cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

When Preference Is Not Satisfied but the Individual Is (2014, methodology): “We used four items from the Cultural Perspectives Questionnaire (CPQ; see Maznevski et al., 2002) to check the validity of our PD group categorization.”
Cultural orientations and preferences for HRM policies and practices: the case of Oman (2007, methodology): “A similar questionnaire has been used by Sparrow and Wu (1998) in a study of Taiwanese employees, by Nyambegera et al. (2000) in a study of Kenyan employees and by Maznevski et al. (2002) in a large study across five different countries.”
Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: a three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions. (2010, unknown): “Similarly, Maznevski et al. (2002) found that their national averages for the individualism– collectivism construct obtained using their CPQ-4 instrument are “consistent with previous research, e.g., Hofstede, 1980a” (p. 275); also, their hierarchy dimension “is similar to Hofstede’s dimension of…”
Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research (2006, background): “This would reduce the validity of crosscountry comparisons at the level of different aspects of the questionnaire (Maznevski et al., 2002).”
Intragroup conflict as a mediator between cultural diversity and work group outcomes (2007, background): “Even though culture and cultural syndromes are clearly macro-level constructs, a number of researchers have suggested that aspects of culture are internalized by individuals and can thus be measured on an individual level (Erez and Earley, 1993; Maznevski et al., 2002; Singelis and Brown, 1995; Tria”
A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework (2006, methodology): “However, Kirkman and Shapiro used individual level measures developed by Maznevski et al. (2002), whereas Spector et al. relied on Hofstede’s (1994) measures.”