Using Staff and Student Time Engaged in Disciplinary Procedures to Evaluate the Impact of School-Wide PBS
By Terrance M. Scott, Susan B. Barrett. 2004
263 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e4dc92789521d9ecc8cc99578c425beaa026636
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Catherine P. Bradshaw
- K. McIntosh
- G. Sugai
- D. Cornell
- Brandi Simonsen
- L. Kern
- Lindsey M. O’Brennan
- Mary M. Mitchell
In General Health Professions
- K. McIntosh
- Catherine P. Bradshaw
- L. Kern
- Lindsey M. O’Brennan
- D. Cornell
- Xitao Fan
- G. Sugai
- Elizabeth Tipton
Citations in the corpus
- Whole‐school positive behaviour support: effects on student discipline problems and academic performance (2005, background): “These monetary advantages include reduced administrative time devoted to disciplinary incidents (Scott & Barrett, 2004) and fewer out-of-district (private) educational placements for high-risk students (Putnam, Luiselli, Sennett, & Malonson, 2002).”
- Schoolwide Positive Behavior Supports (2008, background): “For example, Scott and Barrett (2004) conducted cost–benefit analyses for schools implementing SWPBS; that is, they identified the amount of time saved by school staff and students who were no longer assigning and receiving, respectively, large numbers of office discipline referrals.”
- Reductions in Long-Term Suspensions Following Adoption of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines (2011, background): “Scott and Barrett (2004) found that students lose an average of 6 hours of instructional time for each day suspended.”
- Safety Without Suspensions (2008, background): “In addition, school staff members report greater satisfaction with work and increased time for teaching (Scott & Barrett, 2004).”
- Effects of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on Internalizing Problems (2014, background): “SWPBIS implementation is associated with reductions in the amount of time students are removed from instruction due to ODRs and suspensions (Scott & Barrett, 2004).”
- Multilevel Exploration of Factors Contributing to the Overrepresentation of Black Students in Office Disciplinary Referrals (2010, background): “Regardless of the validity of ODRs, they are a significant concern because they are indicators of missed class time for the student (estimated to be between 20 and 40 min; Scott & Barrett, 2004), which in itself may portend poor educational outcomes for the student.”
- The Relationship Between Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) and Disciplinary Exclusion of Students From Various Ethnic Backgrounds With and Without Disabilities (2011, unknown): “…et al., 2000; Luiselli, Putnam, & Sunderland, 2002; Muscott, Mann, & LeBrun, 2008; Nakasato, 2000; Sadler, 2000; Sadler & Sugai, 2009; Scott & Barrett, 2004; Taylor-Greene et al., 1997; Taylor-Greene & Kartub, 2000) and increases in academic achievement (Ervin, Schaughency, Goodman,…”
- A Look at Current Validity Issues of School-Wide Behavior Support (2004, background): “There are numerous exemplary publications that detail the formation of productive partnerships among school professionals and researchers to develop school-wide support programs that are responsive to the unique resources and needs of schools (Scott & Barrett, 2004; Taylor-Greene et al., 1997).”
- Understanding School Personnel's Resistance to Adopting Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support at a Universal Level of Intervention (2008, background): “This research is encouraging because students may benefit from increases in instructional time as a result of decreases in discipline problems (Scott & Barrett, 2004).”