The role of teacher instructional practices in student collaboration
By N. Webb, M. Franke, Marsha Ing, Angela G. Chan, Tondra De, Deanna Freund, Dan Battey. 2008
142 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/572aa1e065f91250b8c0922141112c12d7877db0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Christa S. C. Asterhan
- Helenrose Fives
- Michelle Buehl
- E. Michael Nussbaum
- Baruch B. Schwarz
- Andrea L. Christensen
- M. Franke
- Julianne C. Turner
In Education
- Helenrose Fives
- Christa S. C. Asterhan
- Michelle Buehl
- Baruch B. Schwarz
- E. Michael Nussbaum
- Kristen Bogner Warzon
- Andrea L. Christensen
- M. Franke
Citations in the corpus
- Motivating Mathematics Learning (2011, background): “, King & Rosenshine, 1993), and to offer good explanations (Webb et al., 2008).”
- Enhancing Students’ Engagement (2014, background): “Research also indicates that through group work, students can learn to deeply engage in content (Johnson & Johnson, 1989), ask good questions (King & Rosenshine, 1993), and offer meaningful explanations (Webb et al., 2008).”
- ‘Explain to your partner’: teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups (2009, result): “(in press ) also found similar results in that the extent to which teachers asked students to elaborate on their explanations about how to solve mathematical problem showed a strong relationship with the nature and extent of students explaining to each other during collaborative conversations.”
- Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories (2016, background): “Overall, low-content teacher interventions that aim at eliciting student thinking seem to be more effective in sustaining productive student dialogue than providing explicit, content-specific explanations and instructions (e.g., Chiu, 2004; Gillies, 2004; Webb et al., 2008).”
- Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education (2011, background): “First, much current work in argumentation emphasizes developing classroom norms of discussion (R. C. Anderson et al., 2001; Webb et al., 2008; Wegerif et al., 1999) but does not distinguish among the various types of argumentation that are specified in dialogue theory.”
- Teachers’ Beliefs, in the Context of Policy Reform (2016, background): “Soliciting explanations from, rather than giving explanations to, students fosters classroom environments conducive to collaborative discourse (Webb et al., 2008).”