Control Mechanisms and the Relationship Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment
By Sandy D. Jap, Shankar Ganesan. 2000
1,469 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/558c6752a906e1e54a941c912e601b847789f2e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Robert W. Palmatier
- Eric Fang
- David A. Griffith
- Kevin Zheng Zhou
- S. Lui
- Yuan Li
- L. Scheer
- Dionysis Skarmeas
Citations in the corpus
- Specific Investments in Marketing Relationships: Expropriation and Bonding Effects (2003, methodology): “For example, distributors often invest in training to service the products of particular manufacturers (e.g., Anderson 1985; Anderson and Weitz 1992; Heide and John 1988; Jap and Ganesan 2000).”
- Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines (2008, background): “For example, Jap and Ganesan (2000) assess the effect of relationship life cycle using a cross-sectional approach that asked respondents to classify their relationship life cycle stage.”
- Control mechanisms across a buyer-supplier relationship quality matrix (2010, background): “…risks anduncertainties always exist in any exchange relationship no matter what its quality, control mechanisms are indispensable for reducing opportunistic behavior and for improving relationship performance (Huntley, 2006; Jap and Ganesan, 2000; Rauyruen and Miller, 2007; Williamson, 1985, 1993).”
- The Many Futures of Contracts (2014, neutral): “…that arise in a collaborative fashion, rather than in a self-maximizing way; and solicit and exchange private information often (Bercovitz, Jap, & Nickerson, 2006; Carson, Madhok, Varman, & John, 2003; Carson, Madhok, & Wu, 2006; Heide & John, 1992; Jap & ganesan, 2000; Poppo & Zenger, 2002).”
- A dyadic approach to the impact of differences in organizational culture on relationship performance (2009, background): “Incompatibility of the transacting organizations' operating philosophies is assumed to negatively influence the feeling of “we-ness” (Jap & Ganesan, 2000), and partner similarity in terms of working practices may be an important element of the overall ‘relational syndrome’ (Noordewier et al., 1990).”
- Contracts, Extracontractual Incentives, and Ex Post Behavior in Franchise Channel Relationships (2012, background): “The use of one-sided contracts may also signal franchisor distrust in the franchisee, whereby the franchisee’s suspicion of the franchisor’s motives deepens (Jap and Ganesan 2000).”