Learning the Rules for Offering Advice: A Quantitative Approach to Second Language Socialization.
By Shoichi Matsumura. 2001
212 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d920a105d63da41cfe998a0c03f2bce0d44e059
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
- Naoko Taguchi
- C. Kinginger
- Rachel L. Shively
- J. C. Félix-Brasdefer
- G. Schauer
- Kathleen Farrell
- Andrew Dight Cohen
- K. Bardovi-Harlig
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Naoko Taguchi
- C. Kinginger
- Rachel L. Shively
- G. Schauer
- J. C. Félix-Brasdefer
- Kathleen Farrell
- Andrew Dight Cohen
- K. Bardovi-Harlig
Citations in the corpus
- A mixed-methodology investigation of the linguistic and affective outcomes of summer study abroad (2003, unknown): “Limited empirical findings suggest that participants make significant gains in language proficiency after their programs (Carlson, Burn, Useem, & Yachimowicz, 1990; Freed, 1995; Lafford, 1995; Matsumura, 2001; Yager, 1998).”
- Assessing Development of Meta-Pragmatic Awareness in Study Abroad. (2004, background): “…performance in rela- tion to variable features of second languages, studying the use of speech acts (Barron, 2002; Hoffman-Hicks, 2001; Lafford, 1995; Matsumura, 2001), the manipulation of stylistic variants (Dewaele & Regan, 2002; Regan, 1995), or the appearance of colloquial lexis in learners’…”
- Cognition, Language Contact, and the Development of Pragmatic Comprehension in a Study‐Abroad Context (2008, background): “Although several previous studies revealed notable pragmatic development in a host environment (Bardovi-Harlig & Dörnyei, 1998; Barron, 2002; Matsumura, 2001; Olshtain & Blum-Kulka, 1985), the context itself might not guarantee a range of different types of pragmatic practice with equal frequency.”
- Development of Speed and Accuracy in Pragmatic Comprehension in English as a Foreign Language (2007, background): “previous research found conventional expressions associated with some speech acts, such as requests, compliments, complaints, and suggestions (e.g., Blum-Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989; Matsumura, 2001; Wolfson & Manes, 1980).”
- Perceptions of Refusals to Invitations: Exploring the Minds of Foreign Language Learners (2008, background): “Although length of stay in the target community may influence learners’ speech-act performance (Matsumura, 2001; Olshtain & Blum-Kulka, 1985), due to the learners’ varied lengths of stay in the target culture, this variable was not analysed in this study.”
- Acquisition of Requests and Apologies in Spanish and French: Impact of Study Abroad and Strategy-Building Intervention (2007, background): “In a study of acquisition of English pragmatics by Japanese Li learners, Matsumura (2001) investigated the development of competence in offering advice over the course of 1 academic year.”
- Contexts and pragmatics learning: Problems and opportunities of the study abroad research (2016, background): “In addition, with a few exceptions (Matsumura 2001; Taguchi 2008a; Félix-Brasdefer & Hasler-Barker 2015), many studies took a snapshot approach by measuring pragmatic competence a single time.”
- THE ROLE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRAGMATIC COMPREHENSION (2008, unknown): “…the target language environment is beneficial for pragmatic development ~Bardovi-Harlig & Dörnyei, 1998; Barron, 2002; Hoffman-Hicks, 1992; Li, 2000; Matsumura, 2001, 2003; Olshtain & Blum-Kulka, 1985; Schauer, 2006; Takahashi & Beebe, 1987!+ In fact, the findings illustrate that pragmatic…”
- Finding the right words in the study abroad context: The development of German learners' use of external modifiers in English (2007, methodology): “…& Belz 2005; Matsumura 2001, 2003; Schauer 2006b).1 Focusing on Japanese university students taking part in a student exchange program with Canada, Matsumura (2001, 2003), using a multiple choice questionnaire, investigated the pragmatic development of his learners’ competence with regard to…”