Standards-based school mathematics curricula : What are they? What do students learn?
By S. Senk, Denisse R. Thompson. 2004
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d91d0cf70790bc7a97c64b158b5d1cb3699850d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Charalambos Y. Charalambous
- H. Hill
- Bharath Sriraman
- Richard A. Lesh
- Janine Remillard
- Douglas H. Clements
- Justin Drwencke
- Xueying Ji
Citations in the corpus
- The Impact of Advanced Curriculum on the Achievement of Mathematically Promising Elementary Students (2009, result): “200 Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 3 are consistent with results of other studies conducted on reform-based curricula (see Clements, 2007; Senk & Thompson, 2003).”
- Longitudinal investigation of the curricular effect: An analysis of student learning outcomes from the LieCal Project in the United States (2011, unknown): “(See Senk and Thompson (2003) for information regarding these NSF-funded curricula.)”
- Psychological Imprisonment or Intellectual Freedom? A Longitudinal Study of Contrasting School Mathematics Approaches and Their Impact on Adults' Lives (2017, background): “A related body of research has examined the value of mathematics curricula designed to support active student engagement and the construction of conceptual understanding (for example, see Schoenfeld, 2002; Senk & Thompson, 2003).”
- The Effects of Content Organization and Curriculum Implementation on Students' Mathematics Learning in Second-Year High School Courses (2013, background): “Moreover, many studies suffered from a perceived evaluator bias because most were conducted in the context of field tests in which evaluators were not independent of the program developers (NRC, 2004; Senk & Thompson, 2003).”
- One Hundred Years of Elementary School Mathematics in the United States: A Content Analysis and Cognitive Assessment of Textbooks From 1900 to 2000 (2010, unknown): “Although beyond the scope of the present analysis, future analysis could judge the impact of reform texts on subsequent textbooks (for a compiled description of some recent mathematics education reform projects, see Senk & Thompson, 2003).”
- Rethinking Parent Involvement: African American Mothers Construct their Roles in the Mathematics Education of their Children (2005, background): “…projects that resulted in instructional materials that supported the standards. ese materials, now used in districts across the country, are referred to as Standards-based curricula (Senk & ompson, 2003) and use approaches unfamiliar to most parents in the United States (Peressini, 1998).”
- Simple Addition Strategies in a First-Grade Class With Multiple Strategy Instruction (2005, background): “…oriented or direct instruction does (Baroody, 2003; Bottge, 1999; Bottge, Heinrichs, Chan, & Serlin, 2001; Bottge, Heinrichs, Mehta, & Hung, 2002; Cichon & Ellis, 2003), but others have indicated that the lowest achieving children do not benefit from reform-based teaching practices unless they…”