Time in applied psychology: The study of "what happens" rather than "what is."

By Robert A. Roe. 2008

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4ffff026826832aaa3522e5a148d816a3d3b8294

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Time in organizational research: Catching up on a long neglected topic in order to improve theory (2012, background): “Steel and König (2006) proposed Temporal Motivation Theory (TMT) as an integrative theoretical framework in which they proposed that time plays an important role in motivational processes.”
Polychronicity and Multitasking: A Diary Study at Work (2015, background): “An increasing number of scholars have called for research addressing the dynamic nature of work-related phenomena by including time in theory and research designs (e.g., George & Jones, 2000; Mitchell & James, 2001; Roe, 2008).”
The Career Satisfaction Scale: Longitudinal measurement invariance and latent growth analysis (2011, background): “However, applied psychology and career research (cf. Hall, 2002; Roe, 2008; Van Der Heijden, Schalk, & van Veldhoven, 2008) call for more studies that explicitly address the role of time and focus on the question ‘what happens’ rather than ‘what is’ (cf. Roe, 2008).”
Teams as Complex Adaptive Systems: Reviewing 17 Years of Research (2017, background): “Only some of their postulates, such as emergence (captured by the multilevel paradigm; Kozlowski & Klein, 2000) and dynamics (captured by the longitudinal paradigm; Roe, 2008), have been adopted by team scientists to better understand teams.”
Time in Individual-Level Organizational Studies: What is it, How is it Used, and Why Isn't it Exploited More Often? (2015, background): “As a result, it is not surprising that scholars have repeatedly suggested that the adoption of a temporal lens is essential for the advancement of organizational science (e.g., Ancona et al. 2001a,b; Bluedorn 2002; George & Jones 2000;McGrath&Rotchford 1983; Roe 2008; Sonnentag 2012).”