KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES

By Morten T. Hansen, Marie Louise Mors, Bjørn Løvås. 2005

801 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Computer Science Applications, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bade1b34ce852eb8dea3d5974fa8aac78f3c1ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Computer Science Applications

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Knowledge management and innovation strategy in the Asia Pacific: Toward an institution-based view (2008, positive): “Studies of KM and innovations draw substantial attention to how knowledge is created, acquired, shared, and diffused within an organization in strategic decision making and execution (Argyres & Silverman, 2004; Hansen, Mors, & Lovas, 2005; Huff, 2000; McFadyen & Cannella, 2004; Turner & Makhija, 2”
Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities (2008, methodology): “We followed the approach suggested by Hausman et al. (1984) in their analysis of patent data and followed by other researchers when dealing with event count data (Almeida & Phene, 2004; Kogut & Chang, 1991) by using negative binomial regressions.”
Expatriate Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity, and Subsidiary Performance (2012, methodology): “Two items were developed for expatriate opportunity seeking for knowledge transfer based on the pilot study and prior research (Hansen et al., 2005; Kostova & Roth, 2002; Reagans & McEvily, 2003).”
The Use of Enterprise Social Network Sites for Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Organizations (2015, background): “Social networks within an organization are a well-studied organizational feature (Burkhardt & Brass, 1990; Lincoln & Miller, 1979), affecting work produced by teams (Cross et al., 2001; Hansen, Mors, & Lovås, 2005; Tsai, 2001) and well as organizational growth over time (Weber, 2012).”
Social structure and technology spillovers from foreign to domestic firms (2012, neutral): “When the foreign firm is not willing to help, search becomes difficult and costly (Hansen et al., 2005; Zuckerman & Sgourev, 2006).”
Does Knowledge Base Compatibility Help or Hurt Knowledge Sharing between Suppliers in Coopetition? the Role of Customer Participation (2013, result): “Thus, this definition is consistent with extant literature that emphasizes not only the exchange of knowledge but also the utilization and the quality of the shared knowledge (Haas and Hansen 2007; Hansen, Mors, and Løvås 2005).”