Studies In Machiavellianism
By J. Urner. 2016
865 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: History, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/490476931fd01896e659b6b2ec205a3e2dff19b0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In History
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- S. Restubog
- Mary B. Mawritz
- Thomas J. Zagenczyk
- R. Tang
- Galit Meisler
- E. Vigoda-Gadot
- Christian Kiewitz
- Matthew J. Quade
In Sociology and Political Science
- P. Jonason
- S. Restubog
- R. Rogoza
- P. Vernon
- Andrea Campbell
- Steven J. Muncer
- Gregory L. Carter
- Thomas J. Zagenczyk
Citations in the corpus
- Borderline Personality Disorder (2016, neutral): “In addition, the exploitation of others is typical of Machiavellian personality traits [47].”
- Psychological Contracts as a Mediator Between Machiavellianism and Employee Citizenship and Deviant Behaviors (2014, methodology): “In the present day, individuals who demonstrate a lack of concern for conventional morality, are emotionally detached, and tend to manipulate others are said to have high levels of the personality trait Machiavellianism (Christie & Geis, 1970).”
- The Malevolent Side of Human Nature (2017, methodology): “…as the execution of political rivals.1 Ever since Christie and Geis developed their MACH test in the 1960s to measure an utilitarian attitude (see Christie & Geis, 1970), psychologists have referred to Machiavellianism as a duplicitous interpersonal style, characterized by a cynical disregard…”
- Perceived organizational politics, emotional intelligence and work outcomes: Empirical exploration of direct and indirect effects (2014, background): “Relying on evidence showing that individuals high in Machiavellianism are emotionally detached in their interactions with others (Christie and Geis, 1970), as well as on evidence demonstrating a negative correlation between Machiavellianism and empathy (Barnett and Thompson, 1985; Wastell and Booth,”
- Competition, autonomy, and prestige: Mechanisms through which the Dark Triad predict job satisfaction ☆ (2015, background): “In Machiavellianism, this may be a function of its approach-orientation to power (Christie & Geis, 1970).”
- Soldiers of misfortune: An examination of the Dark Triad and the experience of schadenfreude (2014, methodology): “The three Dark Triad measures (SRP-4, MACH-IV, and NPI) were scored individually according to their respective scoring requirements before being standardized using z scores and then averaged to create a Dark Triad composite score (Jonason, Li, Webster, & Schmitt, 2009).”
- The Dark Triad and the self-presentation variables of socially desirable responding and self-monitoring (2018, methodology): “Although this prediction may seem self-evident because Machiavellianism is characterized by deception and manipulation of others for personal gain (Christie & Geis, 1970), previous research has shown inconsistent relationships between Machiavellianism and self-monitoring, with some investigations…”
- Employee Machiavellianism to Unethical Behavior (2017, background): “Although extant research identifies Mach as a higher-order construct (Christie & Geis, 1970; Dahling et al., 2009), our findings suggest there is value in examining the influence of the individual Mach facets, especially when testing trait activation theory in relation to unethical behaviors.”
- When the dark ones gain power: Perceived position power strengthens the effect of supervisor Machiavellianism on abusive supervision in work teams (2016, background): “Machiavellians are characterized by cynical and misanthropic beliefs, callousness, a striving for argentic goals (i.e., money, power, and status), and the use of calculating and cunning manipulation tactics (Christie & Geis, 1970).”
- Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (DTDD-T), Short Dark Triad (SD3-T), and Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS-T) (2017, methodology): “For the latter, we used well-known scales, such as the Mach-IV (Christie & Geis, 1970), Levenson's Self-Report of Psychopathy (Levenson, Kiehl, & Fitzpatrick, 1995), NPI-16 (Ames et al., 2006), Big Five Inventory (van Someron, Barnard, & Sandberg, 1994), and Rosenberg's Self-esteem scale…”
- The Dark Triad personality: Attractiveness to women (2014, background): “(2013), Machiavellians are interpersonally duplicitous (McHoskey, 2001a), insincere (Christie & Geis, 1970) and extraverted (Allsopp, Eysenck, & Eysenck, 1991).”
- A primer on the Dark Triad traits (2019, positive): “Machiavellianism is associated with manipulative behaviours, self-interest, exploitation of others, and a ruthless lack of morality (Christie & Geis, 1970).”
- Relationships Between Machiavellianism, Organizational Culture, and Workplace Bullying: Emotional Abuse from the Target’s and the Perpetrator’s Perspective (2014, methodology): “Machiavellianism is a personality syndrome, describing a duplicitous interpersonal style connected with cynical beliefs regarding people and the social world, pragmatic morality, and egocentric motivation (Christie and Geis 1970; Jones and Paulhus 2009; Wilson et al. 1996).”
- The dark side of personality at work (2014, background): “Christie and Geis (1970) have reported extensive evidence that Machiavellians are highly successful negotiators—moreover, Machiavellians seemed to enjoy the combative nature of the negotiating process more than others.”
- The dark side of Facebook: Semantic representations of status updates predict the Dark Triad of personality (2014, methodology): “Machiavellianism is the cold manipulative personality and was originally derived from Machiavelli’s original books (see Christie & Geis, 1970).”
- Relationship between emotional intelligence and aggression: a systematic review (2014, background): “…studies based on variables that did not presuppose such an intention, such as Machiavellianism, which measures the tendency of a person to exhibit manipulative behaviors in order to advance his or her own interests (Christie & Geis, 1970), but not necessarily in order to cause harm to another.”