Social relationships: the nature and function of relational schemas

By J. G. Holmes. 2000

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43c8f704e625f947aab847c822ff5ff5bfd2f0d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between trust, attachment, and antisocial work behaviors (2007, background): “Within social exchange theory, trust has been characterized as a relational schema that motivates social behavior consistent with concern for the needs and interests of others (Holmes, 2000; Holmes & Rempel, 1989; Rusbult & Van Lange, 1996).”
The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. (2008, background): “Relational mechanisms are processes that influence employees’ connections to other people (e.g., Bradbury & Lichtenstein, 2000; Chen, Boucher, & Tapias, 2006; Fiske, 1992; Holmes, 2000).”
Relational Identity and Identification: Defining Ourselves Through Work Relationships (2007, background): “Moreover, research on personal relationships suggests that complementary perceptions tend to emerge and predict relationship satisfaction and stability (Hardin & Conley, 2001; Holmes, 2000).”
Beyond Attitudes: Attachment and Consumer Behavior (2007, background): “Second, given its self-linkages, the brand become self-relevant, impacting one’s readiness to allocate processing resources to the brand (Holmes 2000; Berman and Sperling 1994; Reis and Patrick 1996).”
Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context (2004, background): “Research supporting this point (e.g., Baldwin, 1992; Fiske et al., 1991; Holmes, 2000) suggests that relational interdependence and its action implications are integral to the way we represent people.”
The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands (2005, background): “Third, strong attachments are attended by a rich set of schemas and affectively laden memories that link the object to the self (Holmes, 2000; Mikulincer, Hirschberger, Nachmias, & Gillath, 2001).”
Why We Need Interdependence Theory (2008, background): “People may also use representations of prior interaction partners to ‘fill in the informational gaps’ in interaction with new partners, or may develop frozen expectations that reliably color their perceptions of situations and partners (e.g., Andersen & Chen, 2002; Holmes, 2002).”
Effects of trust and psychological contract violation on authentic leadership and organizational deviance (2013, background): “Within social exchange theory, trust has been characterized as a relational schema that motivates social behavior consistent with concern for the needs and interests of others (Holmes, 2000).”
Thinking of you: nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. (2003, unknown): “Of course, given the interdependent nature of relationships, one’s own interpersonal goals are likely to be strongly related to one’s perceptions of the goals and standards of the partner, and the activation of a relational representation may make the goals and standards of the partner more accessib”
Maintaining One's Self-Image Vis-à-Vis Others: The Role of Self-Affirmation in the Social Evaluation of the Self (2001, unknown): “…Burge, & Hammen, 1997; Hazan & Shaver, 1987), interpersonal relationships (Baldwin & Holmes, 1987; Berscheid & Reis, 1988; Collins & Miller, 1994; Holmes, 2000; Murray & Holmes, 1993), and culture (Heine & Lehman, 1997; Kashima, Yamaguchi, Kim, Choi, Gelfand, & Masaki, 1995; Kitayama & Markus,…”
The Effect of Self–Brand Connection and Self-Construal on Brand Lovers’ Word of Mouth (WOM) (2015, background): “Because emotional attachment implies a rich set of schemas and affectively laden memories (Berman and Sperling 1994; Fedorikhin, Park, and Thomson 2008; Holmes 2000; Mikulincer and Shaver 2005), such brands should be easily accessible from memory, thus leading to positive WOM behaviors.”
Identifying moderators of brand attachment for driving customer purchase intention of original vs counterfeits of luxury brands (2016, background): “, 2005); a material centrality of the object in personal life (Richins, 1994); mental representation and schemes related to self (Holmes, 2000); strong separation distress (Bowlby, 1979) and a strong commitment to engaging into a long-term relationship with the object (Thomson et al.”
Effects of organizational justice, trust and commitment on employees' deviant behavior (2011, background): “On the other hand, there is much research in which OT is correlated with OD (Holmes, 2000; Thau et al., 2007).”
Motherhood and the Construction of “Mommy Identity”: Messages about Motherhood and Face Negotiation (2008, background): “Revealing her weaknesses and failures may make her feel too vulnerable (see works on image threats by Fein & Spencer, 1997; Holmes, 2000; Murray & Holmes, 1993 as examples).”
Beyond fit and attitude: The effect of emotional attachment on consumer responses to brand extensions (2008, background): “, object, person) induces a state of emotion-laden mental readiness that influences the allocation of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral resources towards the object (Holmes, 2000).”
Stakeholder Relationship Bonds (2016, unknown): “The underlying logic of this work is also still being examined, with most research in this area focusing on established romantic relationships (Holmes, 2000).”
Understanding the Links Between Social Support and Physical Health: A Life-Span Perspective With Emphasis on the Separability of Perceived and Received Support (2009, result): “These studies are consistent with broader social-cognitive work on links between relationship constructs and the interpretation of schema-relevant information (Baldwin, 1992; Holmes, 2000).”