A Review of Instruments Assessing Creative and Innovative Environments Within Organizations
By Gro Ellen Mathisen, Staale Einarsen. 2004
268 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d97d5375e5c5a31e0ab2ea460abd61a19cbe911
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Samuel T. Hunter
- Mary T. Dzindolet
- K. Bedell
- Michael D. Mumford
- Paul B. Paulus
- Michael L. A. Hsu
- Sameh Said‐Metwaly
- Eva Kyndt
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Samuel T. Hunter
- Michael L. A. Hsu
- Eva Kyndt
- Mary T. Dzindolet
- Michael D. Mumford
- Hsueh-Liang Fan
- K. Bedell
- Paul B. Paulus
In Social Psychology
- Mary T. Dzindolet
- Samuel T. Hunter
- Paul B. Paulus
- K. Bedell
- Michael L. A. Hsu
- Sameh Said‐Metwaly
- Eva Kyndt
- Michael D. Mumford
Citations in the corpus
- No Idea? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Creativity Training. (2005, background): “suggest that openness and diversity are crucial organizational influences on creativity but more empirical research should be carried out to define the specific characteristics of an innovative climate ( Mathisen and Einarsen, 2004”
- Organizational Innovation Climate and Creative Outcomes: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Time Pressure (2010, methodology): “The KEYS (Assessing the Climate for Creativity) (Amabile et al, 1996 ) was used to measure the organizational innovation climate that would reliably predict employee creativity (Mathisen & Einarsen, 2004 ).”
- Innovation Management Measurement: A Review (2006, unknown): “Rather than attempting to generate an exhaustive list, our objectives were defined in terms of the collation and synthesis of measures, better reflecting the needs of academics and practitioners: we ask ‘What are the measures that have been used, and to what extent do they adequately populate and di”
- Social influence, creativity and innovation (2008, methodology): “This research has led to rich models of creativity and innovation (e.g., West, 2002) and the creation of at least four valid instruments that measure the innovation or creative quality of the social environment of an organization (Mathisen & Einarsen, 2004).”
- Climate for Creativity: A Quantitative Review (2007, background): “More centrally, the evidence compiled by Mathisen and Einarsen (2004) indicated that climate measures can predict creativity and innovation in real-world settings.”
- Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review (2017, background): “Another issue of concern with regard to this approach is the controversy about the meaning of “climate” (Anderson & West, 1998; Mathisen & Einarsen, 2004).”