Sexual Harassment Severity: Assessing Situational and Personal Determinants and Outcomes

By R. Langhout, Mindy E. Bergman, Lilia M. Cortina, L. Fitzgerald, Fritz Drasgow, J. Williams. 2005

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/353a3eb4684c58b4ecb5d33d5a773eae6292fa2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Health

Citations in the corpus

Assessing Classism in Academic Settings (2006, methodology): “Consistent with the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (Fitzgerald, Shullman, et al., 1988), which is one of the most widely used behaviorally based measure of sexual harassment (Langhout et al., 2005), each item had a five-point response scale.”
Putting People Down and Pushing Them Out: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace (2021, background): “When analyzing data from 13,743 women serving in the armed forces, Langhout et al. (2005) found that frequent and pervasive gender harassment triggers a comparable level of distress as infrequent sexual coercion.”
Comparing Sexual Harassment Subtypes Among Black and White Women by Military Rank: Double Jeopardy, the Jezebel, and the Cult of True Womanhood (2008, background): “…results indicated that more sexual harassment of any subtype was related to more psychological distress, consistent with the results of previous studies examining the consequences of experiencing sexual harassment overall (e.g., Fitzgerald et al., 1997; Langhout et al., 2005; Willness et al, 2007).”
Employment Discrimination in Organizations: Antecedents and Consequences (2006, methodology): “Seven studies used an existing probability sample created for a Department of Defense study (Department of Defense 1995 Sexual Harassment Survey, 1997) (e.g., Bergman, Langhout, Palmieri, Cortina, & Fitzgerald, 2002; Langhout et al., 2005).”
Observing Incivility toward Coworkers and Negative Emotions: Do Gender of the Target and Observer Matter? (2012, background): “Emotional reactions may also mediate the relation between experiences of workplace incivility and negative outcomes (Miner-Rubino and Cortina 2007) as has been shown repeatedly in other forms of workplace mistreatment such as sexual harassment (Langhout et al. 2005; Settles et al. 2011).”
Emotional and Behavioral Responses to Workplace Incivility and the Impact of Hierarchical Status (2012, background): “Target appraisals become more negative as harassers become more powerful (Cortina, Fitzgerald, & Drasgow, 2002; Langhout et al., 2005).”
A Review of Organizational Strategies for Reducing Sexual Harassment: Insights from the U. S. Military (2014, background): “Further, sexual harassment is harmful to the well-being of targets, who report increased depression, posttraumatic stress, work withdrawal, intentions to quit, and decreased productivity (Buchanan & Fitzgerald, 2008; Langhout et al., 2005; Willness, Steel, & Lee, 2007).”
Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century. (2018, background): “218 Studies repeatedly show that gender harassment, whether alone or combined with other behaviors, is the most widespread form of sexual harassment (Langhout et al., 2005; Leskinen, Cortina, & Kabat, 2011; Mazzeo, Bergman, Buchanan, Drasgow, & Fitzgerald, 2001).”
Objectifying Media (2014, background): “…sexual attention/coercion that occurs within unbalanced power relationships (Bartling & Eisenman, 1993; Pryor, 1987), there is strong evidence showing that gender harassment between peers constitutes the most common form of harassment (Barak, 2005; Langhout et al., 2005; Shepela & Levesque, 1998).”
Classism in the University Setting: Examining Student Antecedents and Outcomes (2009, unknown): “related outcomes (Fitzgerald, Drasgow, & Magley, 1999; Harned, Ormerod, Palmieri, Collinsworth, & Reed, 2002; Hessin-McInnis & Fitzgerald, 1997; Langhout et al., 2005).”
Sexual Harassment at Work: A Decade (Plus) of Progress (2009, background): “…to mediate the impact of occupational status, organizational climate, frequency and duration of SH, and power differentials between target and harasser on a variety of target responses (Bergman, Langhout, Palmieri, Cortina, & Fitzgerald, 2002; Langhout et al., 2005; Malamut & Offermann, 2001).”