Abusive supervision and the entitled employee

By Paul Harvey, Kenneth J. Harris, William E. Gillis, Mark J. Martinko. 2014

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3127eb2b8ba82f64d355025d5f0376695d3aa16f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. G. Schwarz
2. A. Legood
3. Alexander Newman
4. Allan Lee

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Alexander Newman
2. A. Legood
3. Allan Lee
4. G. Schwarz
5. M. Laird
6. J. Lancaster
7. Paul Harvey
8. N. Eva

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Laird
2. J. Lancaster
3. Paul Harvey
4. G. Schwarz
5. A. Legood
6. Alexander Newman
7. Allan Lee

Citations in the corpus

• Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior (2019, background): “These findings further highlight the pitfalls associated with having highly entitled employees in the workplace, supporting recent research linking PE to other primarily undesirable workplace outcomes (Harvey and Harris 2010; Harvey et al. 2014).”
• Accountability, entitlement, tenure, and satisfaction in Generation Y (2015, background): “Additionally, given psychological entitlement’s power to distort workplace perceptions (Campbell et al., 2004; Harvey and Martinko, 2009; Harvey et al., 2014), we expect that it will begin to interact with accountability to impact satisfaction within a small number of feedback cycles.”