Strategic human resource management effectiveness and firm performance
By O. Richard, N. Johnson. 2001
365 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f34209b6f1222e197e31ae673a1cf4f30017e8b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Anastasia A. Katou
- P. Budhwar
- Haithem Nagati
- Patrick M. Wright
- Valérie Barraud-Didier
- Sylvie Guerrero
- Mehdi Nekhili
- Tawhid Chtioui
Citations in the corpus
- ESG performance and market value: the moderating role of employee board representation (2019, background): “While earlier studies concentrated on the impact of strategic human resource management on firms ’ performance (Richard & Johnson, 2001), the positive role played by socially and environmentally aware employees has been studied more recently (Ehnert, Parsa, Roper, Wagner, & Muller-Camen, 2016;…”
- Human resource management systems and organizational performance: a test of a mediating model in the Greek manufacturing context (2006, methodology): “Life cycle stage: is adopted to capture maturity effects of the organization or to assess stage of organization development (Delaney and Huselid, 1996; Lumpkin and Dess, 1996; Richard and Johnson, 2001).”
- Management and employee involvement in achieving an environmental action-based competitive advantage: an empirical study (2007, background): “, 1997 ; Paul and Anantharaman, 2003 ; Pfeffer, 1994 ; Richard and Johnson, 2001 ; Russo and Fouts, 1997 ), although there is a lot of research still to do.”
- Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research (2002, background): “Using a sample of banks, Richard and Johnson (2001) examined the impact of strategic HRM effectiveness (ratings of how effectively a variety of HR practices were performed) on a number of performance variables.”
- Strategic human resource management: integrating the universalistic, contingent, configurational and contextual perspectives (2005, background): “Its rare, valuable and inimitable character makes it a strategic asset, and a central element of strategic management (Wright and McMahan, 1992; Barney and Wright, 1998; Boxall, 1998; Hitt et al., 2001; Richard and Johnson, 2001; Wright et al., 2001; De Saá Pérez and Garcı́a Falcón, 2002).”
- Innovative human resource management and corporate performance in the context of economic liberalization in India (2008, background): “Using a sample of banks, Richard and Johnson ( 2001 ) examined the impact of strategic HRM effectiveness (ratings of how effectively a variety of HR practices were performed) on a number of performance variables.”
- HRD and HRM Perspectives on Organizational Performance (2013, background): “Return on equity, the ultimate measure of the financial strength of the institution, was included in some studies (Delery & Doty, 1996; Lee & Chee, 1996; Richard & Johnson, 2001).”
- The impact of HR practices, HR effectiveness and a ‘strong HR system’ on organisational outcomes: a stakeholder perspective (2011, background): “Richard and Johnson (2001) found an association between HR managers’ satisfaction with the effectiveness of HR practices and lower labour turnover.”
- High-involvement practices and performance of French firms (2004, background): “Empirical works have shown a direct link with social performance (Gelade and Ivery, 2003; Richard and Johnson, 2001), productivity (Guthrie, 2001; Huselid et al.”