The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior.
By Paul E. Spector, S. Fox. 2005
779 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/241725e35ab9874dc335a9d7ced6a73bd2179ccd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Staale Einarsen
- F. Fraccaroli
- Cristian Balducci
- Laurenz L. Meier
- Paul E. Spector
- Alexander Newman
In Social Psychology
- Cristian Balducci
- F. Fraccaroli
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Paul E. Spector
- S. Fox
- Laurenz L. Meier
- T. Cohen
In Sociology and Political Science
- Staale Einarsen
- M. S. Hershcovis
- A. Skogstad
- Laurenz L. Meier
- F. Fraccaroli
- Cristian Balducci
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- S. Fox
Citations in the corpus
- Examining the Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Workplace Deviance: A Self-Regulatory Perspective (2011, background): “…is volitional (Bennett & Robinson, 2000) and can be motivated by specific instrumental cognitions such as thoughts of revenge or retaliation (e.g., Bies & Tripp, 1998; Bordia, Restubog, & Tang, 2008; Martinko, Gundlach, & Douglas, 2002), or by a desire for personal gain (Spector & Fox, 2005).”
- Are Counterproductive Work Behavior and Withdrawal Empirically Distinct? A Meta-Analytic Investigation (2017, background): “Affective events theory (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996) and the stressor-strain model (Spector & Fox, 2005) are situation-oriented theories that provide additional insight into the Carpenter, Berry / Counterproductive Work Behavior and Withdrawal 839 theoretical relationship between CWB and withdrawal.”
- Family incivility and counterproductive work behavior: A moderated mediation model of self-esteem and emotional regulation ☆ (2016, methodology): “This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license and success (Fox, Spector, & Miles, 2001; Dalal, 2005; Spector & Fox, 2005).”
- When Do Employees Cyberloaf? An Interactionist Perspective Examining Personality, Justice, and Empowerment (2016, background): “…deviance (Lim, 2002), one of four categories (i.e., production, property, and political deviance, and personal aggression) of counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs), defined broadly as behaviors that harm organizations and/or people in organizations (Robinson & Bennett, 1995; Spector & Fox, 2005).”
- The battered apple: An application of stressor-emotion-control/support theory to teachers’ experience of violence and bullying (2010, methodology): “The theoretical framework for this study is the stressor-emotion-control/support (SEC/S) process (Spector and Fox, 2005), which is based upon transactional stress theory (Lazarus, 1999; Perrewé and Zellars, 1999).”
- Getting even with one's supervisor and one's organization: relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors (2009, background): “Despite conceptual differences among these constructs, they are measured in largely the same way (Spector & Fox, 2005).”
- Organizational Supports and Organizational Deviance: The Mediating Role of Organization-Based Self-Esteem (2009, background): “Given we expect OBSE to relate to organizational deviance, yet this relation has not been demonstrated previously, we felt it prudent to control for two antecedent categories of deviance: personality (Cullen & Sackett, 2003) and role stressors (Spector & Fox, 2005).”
- Investigating When and Why Psychological Entitlement Predicts Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior (2019, background): “…aforementioned equity perspective (Adams 1965), which suggests that an individual who perceives inequity or injustice will attempt to restore balance by engaging in retaliatory behaviors such as CWB Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior and Psychological Entitlement 19 (e.g., Spector and Fox 2005).”
- An approach-avoidance framework of workplace aggression (2016, background): “…approach and avoidance behaviors can be useful for distinguishing between certain types of counterproductive workplace behavior (CWB)—or behaviors that harm others in the organization or the organization itself (Fox & Spector, 1999; Spector & Fox, 2005; see also Bennett & Robinson, 2000)—aswell.”
- The impact of role stressors on workplace bullying in both victims and perpetrators, controlling for personal vulnerability factors: A longitudinal analysis (2012, methodology): “Secondly, we also included the perspective of the perpetrators of bullying in the analysis; and, in line with a frustration-aggression hypothesis underlying aggressive behaviour at work (see Spector & Fox, 2005), we tested whether role conflict and role ambiguity predicted the enactment of bullying.”
- Job Stress and Incivility (2011, background): “Spector and Fox (2005) developed a model to explain the relationship between job stress and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs).”
- The Structure of Counterproductive Work Behavior (2016, methodology): “As Spector et al.’s (2006) factors did not appear to describe a higher-order structure that could be integrated well with Gruys and Sackett’s (2003) 11 facets, we also tested the possibility that Spector et al.”