Are Counterproductive Work Behavior and Withdrawal Empirically Distinct? A Meta-Analytic Investigation

By Nichelle C. Carpenter, Christopher M. Berry. 2017

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01db4777815518c73c3578adff366d4f87bde347

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Nichelle C. Carpenter
2. Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler
3. Andrea Fischbach
4. Matthias Baum
5. Philipp Böhnlein
6. M. Tims

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. R. Amrhein
2. Nichelle C. Carpenter
3. Daniel S. Whitman
4. Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler
5. Andrea Fischbach
6. Sharon K. Parker
7. Matthias Baum
8. Philipp Böhnlein

In Social Psychology

1. Nichelle C. Carpenter
2. Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler
3. Andrea Fischbach
4. Matthias Baum
5. Philipp Böhnlein

Citations in the corpus

• Unit-Level Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB): A Conceptual Review and Quantitative Summary (2020, background): “The CWB label conveys the assumption that CWB actions are “counter to productivity,” yet the relationships between CWB and performance/productivity have not been borne out at all at the individual level (ρ = .09; Carpenter & Berry, 2017).”
• Leadership, job crafting, and employee health and performance (2018, background): “Further, prevention-focused job crafting is a kind of counterproductive work behavior (Demerouti et al., 2015), and counterproductive work behaviors are negatively related to health and performance (Carpenter and Berry, 2017).”