Bullying in different contexts: Commonalities, differences and the role of theory

By Claire Monks, Pete Smith, P. Naylor, C. Barter, J. Ireland, Iain Coyne. 2009

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23c18a61a359e01c730d1821f645137ab9c5087c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Adult Psychiatric and Suicide Outcomes of Bullying and Being Bullied by Peers in Childhood and Adolescence (2013, unknown): “This is consistent with profiles found in other studies in which victims are described as withdrawn, unassertive, easily emotionally upset, and as having poor emotional or social understanding,(27) whereas bullies/victims tend to be aggressive, easily angered, and frequently bullied by their sibling”
So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research (2017, background): “These problems have led researchers to explore numerous alternative definitions of bullying (Arora, 1996; Corcoran, Guckin, & Prentice, 2015; Cowie, Naylor, Rivers, Smith, & Pereira, 2002; Gladden et al., 2014; Monks et al., 2009; Sercombe &Donnelly, 2013).”
The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention (2013, background): “The field also lacks an overall theoretical approach, although this can be said to be true of the field of bullying research generally (Monks et al., 2009).”
A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis☆ (2012, background): “The relationship between inter-parental violence and bullying behavior can be explained by social learning theory, which purports that children learn behaviors through observation and role modeling (Monks et al., 2009).”
School bullying from a sociocultural perspective (2018, background): “MARK on in some bullying literature through a focus on ecological frameworks (e.g. Espelage, 2014; Monks et al., 2009).”
What Have I Done to Deserve This? Effects of Employee Personality and Emotion on Abusive Supervision (2014, background): “It is important to study provocative victims because unlike passive victims, they are more likely to display frustrating or irritating emotions or behaviors that may encourage abusive supervision and they also may be inclined to react and perhaps escalate an abusive interaction by aggressively respo”
From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: typology of the phenomenon (2012, background): “These instruments often focus on a class or school setting where peer aggression occurs (Monks et al. 2009; Smith 2010, 2012).”