A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis☆

By Jun Sung Hong, Dorothy Espelage. 2012

1,206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9ef0862af167e9fc28aa21f9ef6236253250c42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Safety Research

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cyber-Victimization and Educational Outcomes for Adolescents (2017, background): “peer relationships, school connectedness, school environment, and school safety problems (Hong & Espelage, 2012).”
School bullying and fitting into the peer landscape: a grounded theory field study (2018, background): “At the same time, there is a growing interest among developmental and educational psychologists in examining bullying in relation to contextual factors and social processes (e.g. Hong and Espelage 2012; Salmivalli 2010).”
Bullying and Students With Disabilities: Examination of Disability Status and Educational Placement (2015, background): “These studies are notable to the bullying and disability literature because they point to a research gap, as bullying is associated with the social environment of an individual (Hong & Espelage, 2012).”
Different uses of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory in public mental health research: what is their value for guiding public mental health policy and practice? (2018, background): “As an example, Hong and Espelage (2012) in their literature review identified risk factors at all ecological levels associated with bullying and peer victimization in school, but did not really consider interactions between these different systems beyond bringing up the fact that the associations…”
Ecological Theory: Preventing Youth Bullying, Aggression, and Victimization (2014, background): “…and peer victimization, this model has often been called a socialecological model and focuses on understanding how individual characteristics of children interact with environmental contexts or systems to promote or prevent victimization and perpetration (Espelage, 2012; Hong & Espelage, 2012).”
Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents' role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying (2017, background): “Youth who are poorly monitored are at higher risk for bullying involvement, both as perpetrators and victims (Espelage, Bosworth, & Simon, 2000; Hong & Espelage, 2012).”
Cross-cultural, developmental psychology: integrating approaches and key insights (2020, background): “…bullying and peer victimization among youth in the United States, expanding out to assess how microsystems like parent-youth relationships, exosystems like exposure to media violence, and macrosystems such as religion all contributed to children's behaviors and beliefs (Hong & Espelage, 2012).”
So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research (2017, background): “…may cause different harm to different individuals based on numerous different individual and environmental ecological factors (e.g., Barboza et al., 2009; Flaspohler, Elfstrom, Vanderzee, Sink, & Birchmeier, 2009; Hong & Espelage, 2012; van der Ploeg et al., 2015; Vitoroulis & Vaillancourt, 2014).”
Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement and Their Associations With Indirect Bullying, Direct Bullying, and Pro-Aggressive Bystander Behavior (2020, background): “However, as with gender differences, findings on this topic have been inconsistent (see Hong & Espelage, 2012 for a review).”