Vaughn Elementary's Innovative Teacher Evaluation System: Are Teacher Evaluation Scores Related to Growth in Student Achievement?

By H. A. Gallagher. 2004

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f0e8c0b2bf747f36014733937905ce93f9d66d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Examining the Use of Classroom Observations in the Evaluation of Special Education Teachers (2014, background): “, 2004; Milanowski, 2004); however, the strength of these relationships has varied across grades and subject areas (Gallagher, 2004; Milanowski, 2004).”
Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: A Research Synthesis. (2008, background): “Review of the research suggests that observation scores have been related to important outcome measures such as student achievement (Gallagher, 2004; Kimball, White, Milanowski, & Borman, 2004; Milanowski, 2004).”
How Teacher Evaluation Methods Matter for Accountability (2014, background): “…older studies (Medley & Coker, 1987; Murnane, 1975; Peterson, 1987, 2000)1 and are based on the relationship between teacher value-added and subjective teacher ratings that are from formal standards and extensive classroom observation (Gallagher, 2004; Kimball & Milanowksi, 2004; Milanowski, 2004).”
Narrowing in on Educational Resources That Do Affect Student Achievement (2006, unknown): “…on the impact of all of these factors except standards-based teacher evaluation score, which is consistently positive (Darling-Hammond, 2000; Gallagher, 2004; Hanushek, 1992; Hanushek, Kain, O’Brien, & Rivkin, 2005; Kimball, White, Milanowski, & Borman, 2004; Milanowski & Kimball, 2005;…”
Examining Teacher Effectiveness Using Classroom Observation Scores (2015, background): “Descriptive studies have found small to moderate positive correlations of FFT scores with student learning, with some variation by grade and subject (Gallagher, 2004; Kimball, White, Milanowski, & Borman, 2004; Milanowski, 2004).”
What Makes for a Good Teacher and Who Can Tell? Working Paper 30. (2009, methodology): “…the relationship between teacher value-added and subjective teacher ratings that are based on formal standards and extensive classroom observation (Gallagher, 2004; Kimball et al., 2004; Milanowski, 2004).4 All of these studies find a positive and significant relationship, despite differences in…”
Do We Know a Successful Teacher When We See One? Experiments in the Identification of Effective Teachers (2011, background): “…for Teaching (Danielson, 2007), one of the most widely used measures of teacher quality that includes a classroom observation component, also have classes with correspondingly high student achievement gains (e.g., Gallagher, 2004; Kimball, White, Milanowski, & Borman, 2004; Milanowski, 2004).”
Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation as a Foundation for Knowledge- and Skill-Based Pay (2006, unknown): “Validity results can be found in Kimball, White, Milanowski, and Borman (2004); Milanowski (2004); Gallagher (2004); and Milanowski, Kimball, and Odden (2005).”
Examining the Relationship Between Teacher Evaluation and Student Assessment Results in Washoe County (2004, result): “In contrast, the systems in Cincinnati (Milanowski, 2004/this issue) and Vaughn Elementary School (Gallagher, 2004/this issue) were designed for higher stakes, contained multiple raters, and employed more extensive training for rater consistency.”
Is Traditional Teaching Really All That Bad? A Within-Student Between-Subject Approach (2011, background): “…the literacy hour at the same point in time in a difference-in-difference framework, the authors show that 4For example Borman and Kimball (2005), Gallagher (2004), Heneman et al. (2006), Holtzapple (2003), Kimball et al. (2004), Milanowski (2004), Matsumura et al. (2006) and Schacter and Thum…”