A cross‐cultural study of work/family demands, work/family conflict and wellbeing: the Taiwanese vs British

By Luo Lu, R. Gilmour, S. Kao, Mao‐Ting Huang. 2006

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The relationship of social support with well-being outcomes via work–family conflict: Moderating effects of gender, dependants and nationality (2017, background): “These countries are, however, quite different in values and traditions from China and Hong Kong, which are predominantly collectivistic and, central to this research, very family-oriented (Luo et al., 2006; Poelmans et al., 2003).”
Work–life balance: eastern and western perspectives (2012, background): “Luo Lu, Gilmour, Kao and Huang ( 2006 ), in their cross-cultural study of work–family demands, WFC and well-being, compared and contrasted employees from an individualistic (UK) and a collectivist (Taiwanese) society.”
Cross cultrual differences on work-to-family conflict and role satisfaction: a Taiwanese-British comparison (2009, background): “…Equivalence All the measures described originated from the West, though some were already translated into Chinese and have proven usable in previous cross-cultural research, including the WFC and family satisfaction scales in Lu et al. (2006) and work satisfaction scale in Spector et al. (2007).”
CROSS-NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN RELATIONSHIPS OF WORK DEMANDS, JOB SATISFACTION, AND TURNOVER INTENTIONS WITH WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT (2007, background): “Counter to Lu et al. (2006), Spector et al. (2004), and Yang et al. (2000), they found support for the same model across all four country clusters.”