Flow experiences at work: for high need achievers alone?

By R. Eisenberger, Jason R. Jones, Florence Stinglhamber, L. Shanock, Amanda T. Randall. 2005

337 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/140f615548bf8811042679525c594be3c9ce7859

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Review of Employee Well-Being and Innovativeness: An Opportunity for a Mutual Benefit (2007, neutral): “Positive mood in turns promotes helping behaviours, creative thinking and suggestions that help the organization to better fulfil its objectives (George & Brief, 1992; Eisenberger et al., 2005).”
Flow at Work and Basic Psychological Needs: Effects on Well‐Being (2017, background): “matching high skill with high challenge, should meet an achievement-oriented individual s need to surpass set standards (Eisenberger et al., 2005).”
Flow experience and team performance: The role of team goal commitment and information exchange (2013, neutral): “…if asking participants to assess their experience after task completion is a prevalent practice in flow research (e.g., Bakker 2005; Demerouti 2006; Eisenberger et al. 2005), it would be possible to increase the accuracy of the flow measure by using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM; Hektner et…”
From strengths use to work performance: The role of harmonious passion, subjective vitality, and concentration (2014, background): “, 2003) and that flow can positively contribute to work performance (Demerouti, 2006; Eisenberger et al., 2005; Kuo & Ho, 2010).”
Job resources and flow at work: Modelling the relationship via latent growth curve and mixture model methodology (2010, result): “It might be that other factors, such as personality characteristics, would be more relevant moderators in the relationship between job resources and flow, as found in earlier studies (Demerouti, 2006; Eisenberger et al., 2005).”
A Meta-Analytic Structural Model of Dispositonal Affectivity and Emotional Labor (2013, background): “Flow experiences have been shown to relate to outcomes including positive mood and higher performance (Csikszentmihalyi & LeFevre, 1989; Eisenberger et al., 2005).”