A Review of Employee Well-Being and Innovativeness: An Opportunity for a Mutual Benefit

By H. Huhtala, Marjo-Riitta Parzefall. 2007

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3d7a50ca3e91e40d715c741026e21a2678cd5c5c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness (2020, methodology): “Indeed, the JD-R model (Bakker and Demerouti, 2017) has been adopted to propose that workrelated positive psychological functioning (i.e. high work engagement) enhances employee innovation (e.g. Huhtala and Parzefall, 2007).”
Work engagement, burnout and related constructs as predictors of turnover intentions : original research (2010, background): “…and burnout as strongly related, but fundamentally different in their separation in the work experience and are, therefore, not opposite poles of a continuum (Denton, Newton, & Bower, 2008; Huhtala & Parzefall, 2007; Rothmann & Joubert, 2007; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004; Schaufeli et al., 2002).”
Daily within-person effects of job autonomy and work engagement on innovative behaviour: The cross-level moderating role of creative self-efficacy (2017, background): “Specifically, the job demands– resources model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007) has been adapted to propose that work-related well-being (i.e., low burnout and high work engagement) promotes employee innovation (Huhtala & Parzefall, 2007).”
Do hotel employees really care for corporate social responsibility (CSR): a happiness approach to employee innovativeness (2021, background): “A handful of studies develop relationships between subjective well-being, employee well-being, innovations, and innovativeness (Huhtala & Parzefall, 2007).”
Management of innovation: role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context (2012, background): “More recently, research of Huijun and Wei (2010) found that psychological empowerment is related to service innovation.”
A Critical Review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for Improving Work and Health (2014, methodology): “In a narrative review, Huhtala and Parzefall ( 2007 ) used the revised JD-R model as a conceptual framework for integrating empirical studies on employees’ propensity to innovate.”
The relationship between innovation and subjective wellbeing (2012, background): “It has also been found that people who report themselves as being time pressured in work also report themselves as being less creative (Amabile et al., 2002; Huhtala and Parzefall, 2007), although the relationship between pressured at work at negative affect has not been fully explored.”