Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition

By R. Sperling, Bruce C. Howard, Lee A. Miller, Cheryl A. Murphy. 2002

476 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1186bbb43b19c6d26f0bee3589e9d0898c6aeb27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Elementary Students' Metacognition and Epistemological Beliefs Considering Science Achievement, Gender and Socioeconomic Status (2009, methodology): “Sperling et al. (2002) investigated the relationship between achievement and metacognition.”
Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring? (2007, background): “For example, Sperling, Howard, Miller, and Murphy (2002) examined various strategy measures with 412 students in third to eighth grades.”
Metacognition: A Literature Review (2011, background): “For example, metacognition is not directly observable in students (Sperling et al., 2002).”
The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance (2020, result): “This finding coincides with other studies (Brown and Kinshuk 2016; Sperling et al. 2002; Teng 2017a, 2017b).”
Multi-method assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: how you test is what you get (2008, background): “…Belgium e-mail: anne.desoete@Ugent.be A. Desoete Arteveldehogeschool, Ghent, Belgium Vermunt 1996), retrospective (e.g., Artelt 2000), on-line (e.g., Artzt and Armour-Thomas 1992) and combined (e.g., Sperling et al. 2002) techniques or teacher ratings can be used for elementary school children.”
Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy (2006, methodology): “Categories in Veenman’s (1993) system for coding thinking-aloud protocols in problem-solving were added and classified into the six major categories in the new taxonomy.”
The assessment of metacognition in children aged 4–16 years: a systematic review (2017, methodology): “One example is that of parallel forms reliability Sperling et al. (2002) focuses on testing two forms of the same tool in one experiment; the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (JrMAI), versions A and B.”
The Measurement and Predictive Ability of Metacognition in Middle School Learners (2012, methodology): “Jr. MAI = Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory; SMQ = Swanson Metacognitive Questionnaire; GPA = grade point average. teacher provided students’ metacognition ratings and science GPA.”
Measuring the complexity of upper primary school children’s self-regulated learning: A multi-component approach (2013, background): “MAI (Sperling et al., 2002) focuses on metacognition and the PALS (Midgley et al.”