Transformational leadership in Norway: Outcomes and personality correlates

By Hilde Hetland, G. Sandal. 2003

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10f80f22467784f169527ac04f03b200bda8e594

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Thin Line Between Empowering and Laissez-Faire Leadership: An Expectancy-Match Perspective (2018, methodology): “This translation was obtained using a back-and-forward translation procedure and has been used in previous research (cf. Buch et al., 2014; Hetland & Sandal, 2003).”
An Affective Events Model of Charismatic Leadership Behavior: A Review, Theoretical Integration, and Research Agenda (2009, unknown): “…moral reasoning (Turner, Barling, Epitropaki, Butcher, & Milner, 2002); trait optimism, hope, and resiliency (Peterson, Walumbwa, Byron, & Myrowitz, 2009); warmth (Hetland & Sandal, 2003); and self-confidence, pragmatism, feminine attributes, and nurturance (Ross & Offermann, 1997).”
The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). (2008, background): “…work dimensions , for example , punctuality , job preparedness , and ability to work alone in the Netherlands ( IPAT , 2004a ) ; call - center customer service performance in Britain ( Williams , 1999 ) ; and leadership effective - ness ratings in Norwegian managers ( Hetland and Sandal , 2003 ) .”
Linking the Big Five-Factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership; perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator (2005, unknown): “…traits of charismatic and transactional leaders (e.g., Bono & Judge, 2004; Church & Waclawski, 1998; Crant & Bateman, 2000; De Hoogh et al., 2005; Hetland & Sandal, 2003; House & Howell, 1992; Howell & Avolio, 1993; Howell & Higgins, 1990; Judge & Bono, 2000; Kuhnert & Lewis, 1987; Ployhart et…”
Human challenges in polar and space environments (2006, background): “These aspects are not unique to ICE environments, but have consistently been found to relate to group efficiency, motivation and satisfaction in more customary organizations as well, often referred to as transformational leadership (Bass and Avolio 1995; Hetland and Sandal 2003).”
The relationship between ‘workaholism’, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality (2010, background): “It has been postulated that needs satisfaction (e.g. work motivation, work engagement, satisfaction) can be facilitated by organizational interventions (e.g. transformational leadership) (Hetland & Sandal, 2003).”
Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers (2010, background): “Representatives of this school in recent times include Kirkpatrick and Locke (1991) for general leadership, as well as Turner (1999) for leadership in project management. The 1940s brought the behavior school of studies, which emphasized the styles adopted by leaders for their particular leadership ”
Perceptions of transformational leadership and job satisfaction: The roles of personality traits and psychological empowerment § (2016, background): “Further, Hetland and Sandal (2003) posit that agreeableness has the strongest correlation to both transformational leadership and job satisfaction because it includes warmth.”
The relationship between personality and transformational leadership (2006, background): “Introduction Leadership theories began with trait theories of great leaders (Bass, 1990; Stogdill, 1974) and after several decades the personality of leaders stimulated interest once again (Austin and Murray, 1993; Bartram, 1992; Bass, 1985; Hetland and Sandal, 2003; Peterson et al., 2003).”
Leadership and Fulfillment of the Three Basic Psychological Needs at Work. (2011, background): “CDI 16,5 Previous research has linked transformational leadership to an extensive list of outcome variables such as job satisfaction, motivation and well-being (Hetland and Sandal, 2003; Hetland et al., 2007; Judge and Piccolo, 2004; Podsakoff et al., 1990).”