Assessing the team environment for knowledge sharing: an empirical analysis
By Celia Zárraga, J. Bonache. 2003
238 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0507977dea282d074866d762d1f20b893ae0327d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- N. J. Foss
- Torben Pedersen
- Dana B. Minbaeva
- Jakob Lauring
- Angela Titi Amayah
- Jialin Yi
- Laurent Taskin
- Flore Bridoux
In Strategy and Management
- N. J. Foss
- Torben Pedersen
- Dana B. Minbaeva
- Keng-Boon Ooi
- Voon‐Hsien Lee
- Flore Bridoux
- Jakob Lauring
- Mia Reinholt
Citations in the corpus
- Multicultural organizations: common language, knowledge sharing and performance (2011, background): “Knowledge sharing is argued to lead to better performance due to improved decision making and better coordination ( Zarraga and Bonache, 2003”
- Determinants of knowledge sharing in a public sector organization (2013, background): “Degree of courage Zárraga and Bonache (2003) An individual’s ability to express his or her opinions without fear”
- The relationship between high‐commitment HRM and knowledge‐sharing behavior and its mediators (2011, methodology): “Based on existing KM research and scales (Zarraga and Bonache, 2003), this study developed a four-item scale to measure employee knowledge-sharing behavior.”
- HRM practices and knowledge sharing: an empirical study (2011, background): “From the compensation and reward programs implemented by firms, it is found that compensation and incentives are important practices in relation to knowledge sharing ( Zarraga and Bonache, 2003”
- The Role of Openness to Cognitive Diversity and Group Processes in Knowledge Creation (2009, background): “…addition to the small number of studies exploring the social dynamics of knowledge creation (Fedor, Ghosh, Caldwell, Maurer, & Singhal, 2003; Zarraga & Bonache, 2003) by providing a clear justification and some empirical support for the behavioral pathway through which openness to cognitive…”
- Modeling team knowledge sharing and team flexibility: The role of within-team competition (2014, background): “Within-team competition has the potential motivational power to encourage or discourage team members to share their knowledge (Hansen et al., 2005; Tjosvold et al., 2003a) and it represents a team environment that may affect knowledge sharing within the team (Zarraga and Bonache, 2003).”
- Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices (2005, background): “In fact, there seems to be unanimous agreement that individuals will be more willing to share what they know in an open and trusting culture (Davenport and Prusak, 1998; Faraj and Wasko, 2001; Irmer, 2002; Kang et al., 2003; Leana and Van Buren, 1999; Robertson and O’Malley, 2000; Settoon and Mossho”
- A measure of knowledge sharing behavior: scale development and validation (2009, background): “Some empirical studies assessed KSB by simply asking people’s perception of the degree of knowledge sharing in different scenarios, such as the studies of Zarraga & Bonache (2003) and Kamdar et al. (2004).”
- Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters (2009, background): “been given to reward schemes ( Zarraga and Bonache, 2003; Minbaeva et al., 2003; Minbaeva,”
- Human Capital, Social Capital, and Social Network Analysis: Implications for Strategic Human Resource Management (2015, background): “In particular, as companies continue shifting toward team-based structures and compete through improved knowledge management systems (Zárraga & Bonache, 2003), it will be critical to understand what kinds of employees help maximize team potential and the flow of knowledge through the organization.”
- Telework: a challenge to knowledge transfer in organizations (2010, background): “…be invested in tasks with clearer returns) that are not completely compensated by rewards, while individuals or groups who do not contribute to knowledge sharing and free-ride on contributors’ efforts cannot be punished (Cabrera and Cabrera 2002; Zárraga and Bonache 2003; Cabrera et al. 2006).”