Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the scandinavian approach

By Staale Einarsen. 2000

1,051 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0466a06f8e8d5de38223758397671ccfba4849f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Interventions in workplace bullying: A multilevel approach (2010, background): “The concept of bullying has been developed over a period of approximately 20 years (Crowford, 1999; Einarsen, 1999, 2000; Einarsen & Skogstad, 1996; Heames & Harvey, 2006; Hoel, Cooper, & Faragher, 2001; Hogh & Dofradottir, 2001; Leymann, 1996; Leymann & Gustafsson, 1996 [Leymann conducted several…”
Job autonomy and workload as antecedents of workplace bullying: A two-wave test of Karasek's Job Demand Control Model for targets and perpetrators (2011, background): “Studies in the realm of bullying research about antecedents have mostly been inspired by the ‘work environment hypothesis’ (Einarsen, 2000; Leymann, 1996).”
Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review (2012, background): “As opposed to many other concepts describing interpersonal aggression, workplace bullying is not an either/or phenomenon, but rather a gradually evolving process (Einarsen, 2000).”
Coping with bullying in the workplace (2001, methodology): “In other studies, part of the definition of bullying is that individuals have to be in a situation where they are unable to defend themselves against bullying (Einarsen, 2000). In such situations they might find strategies other than problem solving to cope with the situation, such as thinking about”
Managers in the firing line: Contributing factors to workplace bullying by staff – an interview study (2007, background): “Thus, the important and widely accepted defining characteristics of workplace bullying appear to be the persistent use of inappropriate behaviors, and the inability of the target to defend themselves due to a power imbalance (Einarsen 2000).”
Target personality and workplace victimization: A prospective analysis (2010, background): “Additionally, because the current research examined a specific form of workplace victimization (interpersonal conflict), we should note that it is unclear whether the current findings can be generalized to other forms of victimization, such as abusive supervision (Tepper, 2000), bullying (Einarsen, ”
Recognition of workplace bullying: a qualitative study of women targets in the public sector (2006, background): “recognising shifts in and abuse of power (Einarsen, 2000; Lewis & Orford, 2005; Zapf & Gross, 2001).”
Workplace Bullying, Mobbing and General Harassment: A Review (2013, neutral): “However, scholarship in the area of workplace bullying has not been grounded in a strong theory base (Einarsen 2000).”
Psychosocial safety climate (PSC) and enacted PSC for workplace bullying and psychological health problem reduction (2017, background): “Bailey, Dollard, McLinton, and Richards (2015) did not find a lagged relationship between bullying and harassment on emotional exhaustion over 1 year but Einarsen and Nielsen (2015) found unadjusted significant effects on psychological distress over 5 years; as bullying is a long-lasting process (Ei”