Teachers' Knowledge of Literacy Concepts, Classroom Practices, and Student Reading Growth

By Shayne B. Piasta, Carol McDonald Connor, Barry J. Fishman, F. Morrison. 2009

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01d4019e907325035deaff09502cb784484a2a8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Making time for literacy: teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning (2014, background): “Although a number of studies have documented that improving teachers’ knowledge of code concepts and skills through professional development can lead to improved student outcomes in reading (e.g., McCutchen et al., 2009; Piasta et al., 2009; Podhajski, Mather, Nathan, & Sammons, 2009; Spear-Swerling”
Peter Effect in the Preparation of Reading Teachers (2012, background): “In a recent study by Piasta, Connor McDonald, Fishman, and Morrison (2009) , a significant interaction effect for teacher knowledge and number of observations of explicit decoding instruction was reported.”
Contribution of Phonemic Segmentation Instruction With Letters and Articulation Pictures to Word Reading and Spelling in Beginners (2011, unknown): “Previous studies have shown that teachers may lack this knowledge so they need help to understand the phoneme-grapheme system of correspondences and how articulation gestures define and distinguish among phonemes ( McCutcheon et al, 2002 ; Moats, 1994 ; Piasta, Connor, Fishman, & Morrison, 2009 ).”
Early childhood educators' knowledge, beliefs, education, experiences, and children's language- and literacy-learning opportunities: What is the connection? (2016, methodology): “Specifically, we used an adaptation of the Individualizing Student Instruction (ISI) classroom observation system (Connor, Morrison et al., 2009; Connor, Piasta et al., 2009), which captures the amount of instruction individual children experience across multiple content types.”