The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth

By M. Mentzer. 2004

1,301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00ea5e272d25927c5bc7fed02ef510fb9f759b9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Why we still don't eat insects: Assessing entomophagy promotion through a diffusion of innovations framework (2015, background): “The Model T not only had a strong relative advantage over horses, but also spawned various other technologies: new cars, new parts, new accessories, and other massproduced items (Christensen & Raynor, 2003).”
Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory* (2006, background): “Rather, I simply highlight how radically different this suggestion is from what is found in the disruptive innovation literature (e.g., Christensen and Raynor, 2003).”
Airbnb: disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector (2015, background): “…to tourism accommodation espoused by Airbnb and other similar companies can best be viewed through the lens of disruptive innovation theory, which was proposed and popularised by Clayton Christensen in several seminal works (Bower & Christensen, 1995; Christensen, 1997; Christensen & Raynor, 2003).”
Assessing India's lead market potential for cost‐effective innovations (2012, neutral): “Apart from their low costs, such disruptive innovations (Christensen and Raynor, 2003) generally have two other interesting features: .”
Digital innovation: A review and synthesis (2019, background): “Using the theoretical basis of disruptive innovation (Christensen & Raynor, 2003), Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen (2011) propose that innovative skills can be learned by building capabilities that include associations or connections between questions, problems and ideas from unrelated fields, and…”
Corporate Entrepreneurship: State‐of‐the‐Art Research and a Future Research Agenda (2013, background): “Adherents of disruptive innovation principles (e.g., Christensen and Overdorf, 2000; Christensen and Raynor, 2003) would undoubtedly recognize the ideas that the venture designed to address a disruptive market should be placed in a separate unit shielded from the politics of the parent organization.”
Performance Implications of Firm Resource Interactions in the Acquisition of R&D-Intensive Firms (2008, background): “…(Hill and Rotharmel 2003), the result is a dilemma where firms can either risk obsolescence and loss of market share (King et al. 2003) or invest in R&D, where it is estimated that between 46% and 75% of spending goes toward products that ultimately fail (Christensen and Raynor 2003, Hudson 1994).”
Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research (2018, background): “Researchers have also studied semiconductors (Christensen, 2006; d’Arbeloff, 1996), computers (Christensen, 1997), retailing (Christensen and Tedlow, 2000), motorcycles and cars (Christensen and Raynor, 2003), management education (Christensen et al.”
The Role of Dynamic Capabilities in Responding to Digital Disruption: A Factor-Based Study of the Newspaper Industry (2015, background): “According to the RPV framework, processes that govern investment decisions are the most crucial processes in which many organizations ’ most serious disabilities reside when attempting to respond to disruptive innovations [28].”
Assessing Airbnb as a disruptive innovation relative to hotels: Substitution and comparative performance expectations (2017, background): “As outlined by hristensen (1997) and Christensen and Raynor (2003), a disrupive innovation’s appeal does not come from improved product erformance; somewhat counterintuitively, disruptive innovations ctually underperform when compared with existing competitors’ rimary attributes.”
Advancing Strategic Entrepreneurship Research: The Role of Complexity Science in Shifting the Paradigm (2009, neutral): “Such innovation is organic, emergent, resists planning, and can morph into unpredictable forms (Christensen & Raynor, 2003).”
*Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda (2006, background): “An important insight from the literature is that circumstances outside the control of entrepreneurs and managers often require responses that are not within the firm's repertoire of routines (Christensen & Raynor, 2003; Miller, 1993; Moorman & Miner, 1998a, 1998b).”
Editorial: Business model innovation - the challenges ahead (2013, background): “Business model innovation is related to the business model and research in this area has increased since the mid-1990s (see e.g. Slywotzky, 1996; Slywotzky and Morrison, 1998; Amit and Zott, 2001; Chesbrough and Rosenbloom, 2002; Magretta, 2002; Christensen and Raynor, 2003; Markides and Charitou, 2”
The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach (2004, background): “For traditional industry players adapting to changes in the competitive environment is especially crucial when new dynamic competitors rapidly dispute their market position as an incumbent (cf. Christensen 1997; Christensen 2003).”