Tim McNamara

Language and Linguistics · 2001–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 18 researchers and is trusted by 22 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Language and Linguistics — 19 citations into it; #664 of 3,093 by trust here, #289 by citations
• Education — 17 citations into it; #2,023 of 11,309 by trust here, #3,976 by citations
• Literature and Literary Theory — 14 citations into it; #1,615 of 2,496 by trust here, #664 by citations
• Management Science and Operations Research — 12 citations into it; #3,419 of 11,946 by trust here, #4,602 by citations
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 10 citations into it; #1,976 of 8,223 by trust here, #1,677 by citations
• Artificial Intelligence — 8 citations into it

Whom Tim McNamara trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Michael Kane
2. Lyle F. Bachman
3. G. Brindley
4. Annie Brown
5. Glenn Fulcher
6. C. Leung
7. P. Rea‐Dickins
8. D. Morgan
9. James J. Butler
10. Robert J. Mislevy

Who trusts Tim McNamara overall

1. Peter Robinson
2. L. Harding
3. Ryo Nitta
4. Robert J. Mislevy
5. Annie Brown
6. Noriko Iwashita
7. Nivja H. de Jong
8. Fumiyo Nakatsuhara
9. C. Elder
10. Carsten Roever

Papers from Tim McNamara's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Tim McNamara trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Design and analysis in task-based language assessment
2. Validating Measures of Performance
3. Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework
4. Mirror, mirror on the wall: identifying processes of classroom assessment
5. Can We Predict Task Difficulty in an Oral Proficiency Test? Exploring the Potential of an Information‐Processing Approach to Task Design
6. Current Concerns in Validity Theory
7. TALKING AND TESTING: DISCOURSE APPROACHES TO THE ASSESSMENT OF ORAL PROFICIENCY.Richard Young and Agnes Weiyun He (Eds.). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1998. Pp. x + 395. NLG 138 cloth. (Studies in Second Language Acquisition)
8. A New Academic Word List
9. Decision Making While Rating ESL/EFL Writing Tasks: A Descriptive Framework.
10. Making sense of discourse analysis

Their papers

• Language testing: The social dimension (2006) — 683 citations
• Developing a comprehensive, empirically based research framework for classroom-based assessment (2012) — 121 citations
• The Rasch wars: The emergence of Rasch measurement in language testing (2012) — 98 citations
• Assessed Levels of Second Language Speaking Proficiency: How Distinct? (2007) — 406 citations
• Validity in Language Testing: The Challenge of Sam Messick's Legacy (2006) — 101 citations
• AN EXAMINATION OF RATER ORIENTATIONS AND TEST-TAKER PERFORMANCE ON ENGLISH-FOR-ACADEMIC-PURPOSES SPEAKING TASKS (2005) — 203 citations
• Estimating the difficulty of oral proficiency tasks: what does the test-taker have to offer? (2002) — 120 citations
• Can We Predict Task Difficulty in an Oral Proficiency Test? Exploring the Potential of an Information‐Processing Approach to Task Design (2001) — 245 citations