Design and analysis in task-based language assessment

By Robert J. Mislevy, L. Steinberg, R. Almond. 2002

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Building and Supporting a Case for Test Use (2005, methodology): “More recent argument-based approaches to validation (e.g., Kane, 1992, 2001, 2002; Kane, Crooks, & Cohen, 1999; Mislevy, 2003; Mislevy, Steinberg, & Almond, 2002, 2003 ) provide a logic and set of procedures for articulating claims and for collecting evidence to support these claims.”
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO EVIDENCE-CENTERED DESIGN (2003, background): “Again the interested reader is referred to Mislevy, Steinberg, and Almond (2002) for a discussion of the design process from start to finish.”
Q-Matrix Construction: Defining the Link Between Constructs and Test Items in Large-Scale Reading and Listening Comprehension Assessments (2009, unknown): “2 For an introduction to evidence centered design in the context of language assessment, see Mislevy, Steinberg, and Almond (2002 ).”
Validity in Language Testing: The Challenge of Sam Messick's Legacy (2006, background): “4This was of course not a uniquely Australian policy; Moore (1996b) and Brindley (1998) situate its”
Classroom-based assessment: Possibilities and pitfalls (2007, background): “This continues to be the case, with significant developments in, for example, our understanding of validity (e.g., Kuiman, 1998; Read & Chapelle, 2001; Mislevy, Steinberg, & Ahnond, 2002; Bachman, 2004) influenced by Messick's now classic article (Messick, 1989), greater technical sophistication i”