Bradford S. Bell

Social Psychology · 2003–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 33 researchers and is trusted by 57 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Bradford S. Bell trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Richard E. Mayer
  2. E. Lind
  3. A. Elliot
  4. Eduardo Salas
  5. Steve W. J. Kozlowski
  6. J. V. van Merriënboer
  7. M. Marks
  8. John E. Mathieu
  9. John R. Anderson
  10. Judith M. Harackiewicz

Who trusts Bradford S. Bell overall

  1. Steve W. J. Kozlowski
  2. Samantha K. Baard
  3. John E. Mathieu
  4. Dustin K. Jundt
  5. D. van Knippenberg
  6. Abraham Carmeli
  7. Aleksander P. J. Ellis
  8. Eduardo Salas
  9. Matthew J Pearsall
  10. Robert E. Ployhart

Papers from Bradford S. Bell's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Bradford S. Bell trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams (Psychological Science in the Public Interest)
  2. A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  3. A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
  4. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  5. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.
  6. Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries
  7. Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating.
  8. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  9. Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  10. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. (American Psychologist)

Their papers