Robin M. Hogarth

General Decision Sciences · 1975–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 40 researchers and is trusted by 29 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• General Decision Sciences — 36 citations into it; #369 of 1,995 by trust here, #883 by citations
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 19 citations into it; #3,415 of 10,852 by trust here, #6,902 by citations
• Management Science and Operations Research — 18 citations into it; #4,330 of 11,946 by trust here, #6,888 by citations
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 16 citations into it
• Economics and Econometrics — 12 citations into it; #7,661 of 23,481 by trust here, #12,444 by citations
• Social Psychology — 12 citations into it; #3,114 of 15,694 by trust here, #7,199 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 11 citations into it
• Safety Research — 10 citations into it; #2,292 of 5,829 by trust here, #4,795 by citations

Whom Robin M. Hogarth trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Gerd Gigerenzer
2. Daniel G. Goldstein
3. Daniel Kahneman
4. Amos Tversky
5. Paul Slovic
6. J. McMackin
7. Jonathan Haidt
8. H. J. Einhorn
9. A. Dijksterhuis
10. Laura Martignon

Who trusts Robin M. Hogarth overall

1. Gerd Gigerenzer
2. Clintin P. Davis-Stober
3. Anuj K. Shah
4. Daniel G. Goldstein
5. Daniel M. Oppenheimer
6. Viktor Dörfler
7. Ilan Yaniv
8. Alexander S. Rich
9. Natalia Karelaia
10. L. Antony

Papers from Robin M. Hogarth's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Robin M. Hogarth trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. (Psychology Review)
2. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality.
3. The psychology of interpersonal relations
4. Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence.
5. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice
6. Choices, Values, and Frames
7. Intuition: a social cognitive neuroscience approach. (Psychological bulletin)
8. Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison
9. Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice
10. Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. (Psychology Review)

Their papers

• Ignoring information in binary choice with continuous variables: When is less “more”? (2005) — 97 citations
• Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When “goods satiate” (2009) — 247 citations
• Deciding Analytically or Trusting your Intuition? The Advantages and Disadvantages of Analytic and Intuitive Thought (2002) — 219 citations
• The Two Settings of Kind and Wicked Learning Environments (2015) — 142 citations
• Emotion and Reason in Everyday Risk Perception (2011) — 91 citations
• Intuition: A Challenge for Psychological Research on Decision Making (2010) — 182 citations
• Forecasting and uncertainty in the economic and business world (2009) — 163 citations
• "Take-the-best" and other simple strategies: Why and when they work "well" with binary cues (2006) — 101 citations
• Judging probable cause. (1986)
• Unit weighting schemes for decision making (1975)