Intuition: A Challenge for Psychological Research on Decision Making

By Robin M. Hogarth. 2010

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7798cf3cd7e16a7af1198a9f4da3010a078c58d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Francesco Ackermann
2. E. Sadler‐Smith
3. Julie Gore
4. Viktor Dörfler

In General Decision Sciences

1. Francesco Ackermann
2. Viktor Dörfler
3. E. Sadler‐Smith
4. Julie Gore

In Safety Research

1. Francesco Ackermann
2. Viktor Dörfler
3. E. Sadler‐Smith
4. Julie Gore

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding intuition: The case for two forms of intuition (2012, result): “Kahneman (2010, personal communication) said that he was sure that Simon’s view of intuition includes synthesis, and this is completely consistent with the view of intuition as pattern recognition (e.g. Hogarth, 2010; Simon, 1987).”
• Unpacking Intuition: A Process and Outcome Framework (2011, background): “One potential source of confusion relates to the fact that insight and intuition are not the same (Hogarth, 2010), however they are closely related most notably in the domain of creativity to the extent that a creative intuition segues to an explicit insight at the so-called “eureka moment.”