Choices, Values, and Frames

By Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky. 2000

9,252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Philosophy, Economics & Operations Research

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Philosophy

In Economics & Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment (2020, background): “This interferes with efforts to order them systematically, a constraint that also applies to people’s desires or ethical beliefs, given that they too display inconsistency and variation depending upon how a choice is described (Kahneman and Tversky, 2000, 168-69).”
News Framing and Public Opinion (2012, background): “Equivalency framing refers to the presentation of logically identical, yet differently phrased decision scenarios.(13) In emphasis framing, researchers choose material that emphasizes several aspects of an issue.”
Fair and square: the four sides of distributive justice (2001, background): “Nozick, at the opposite extreme, is representative of many moral philosophers and some welfare economists whose subject matter is notional justice, or justice in highly abstract and theoretical terms. They seek to define normative (or prescriptive) theories of justice, as in the works of Aristotle (”
Response to Travel Information: A Behavioural Review (2015, background): “…(Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Tversky & Kahneman, 1992) asserts that in static (‘one-shot’) decisions, choice makers tend to frame uncertain outcomes as prospective gains or losses relative to some reference point rather than final end-states, as suggested by EUT (Kahneman & Tversky, 1984).”
Self-determination. The tyranny of freedom. (2000, neutral): “(Kahneman & Tversky, 1984, p. 347) Almost 90% of people asked this question said yes.”
Probability weighting and the ‘level’ and ‘spacing’ of outcomes: An experimental study over losses (2009, background): “It may also capture the psychophysics of chance ( Kahneman and Tversky 1984; Gonzalez and Wu 1999) as well as some strategic attitude towards probabilistic risk (Wakker 2004).”
Patterns of Behavior of Professionally Managed and Independent Investors (2001, background): “Psychologists and some economists, led by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, claim that investors do not always behave as expected utility maximizers (see, e.g., Samuelson, 1963, Kahneman and Tversky, 1979, 1984, Tversky and Kahneman, 1992, and Benartzi and Thaler, 1995, 1996, to name but a few).”
Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions (2008, neutral): “…significant because, collectively, these tasks assess whether people adhere to some of the most fundamental strictures of rational thought (see Evans & Over, 1996; Gilovich et al., 2002; Kahneman & Tversky, 1996, 2000; Over, 2004; Samuels & Stich, 2004; Stanovich, 1999, 2004, 2008b; Stein, 1996).”
The Psychological Benefits of Superstitious Rituals in Top Sport (2005, background): “This expectation is based partially on the notion that losses loom larger than gains and that people are oriented more strongly toward minimizing losses than toward maximizing gains (e.g., Kahneman & Tversky, 1984).”