Deciding Analytically or Trusting your Intuition? The Advantages and Disadvantages of Analytic and Intuitive Thought

By Robin M. Hogarth. 2002

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c408d673dea26a38425d3973e64a9a102ad24d46

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Fit of Thinking Style and Situation: New Measures of Situation-Specific Experiential and Rational Cognition (2009, background): “While fit between task and mode of thought appear to improve performance, lack of fit has been found to degrade performance (Hammond et al. 1987; Hogarth 2005; McMacklin and Slovic 2000; Schooler, Ohlsson and Brooks 1993; Schooler and Engstler-Schooler 1990).”
Intuition: A Challenge for Psychological Research on Decision Making (2010, background): “In Hogarth (2005), I suggested that task complexity is an important source of error in analytic thought.”
Assessing Rational and Intuitive Thinking Styles (2009, background): “The preferred strategy is thought to generally prevail in reasoning tasks, although there obviously is interaction with the demands of and experience with the situation (e.g., Epstein, 1990; Hogarth, 2005; Pacini & Epstein, 1999).”
Feeling the Future: The Emotional Oracle Effect (2012, unknown): “It is now well accepted that in the course of our daily functioning, we encode a vast amount of information about our environment, most of it unconsciously (Bargh and Chartrand 1999; Hogarth 2005; Lewicki 1986).”
Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities (2012, background): “…executive control when they can be completed using cognitively less demanding strategies (see, e.g. Evans, 2008, 2009; Glöckner & Witteman, 2010; Hogarth, 2005; Stanovich, 2009), for example when responses are driven by clear “perceptual” patterns or environmental cues, rely on learned…”
Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians (2017, background): “…we should expect this to apply to political expertise depends on whether politics is an environment that allows for accurate feedback calibration by decision makers, which is an open question (Butler and Dynes 2016; Hogarth 2002; Mellers et al. 2015; List and Mason 2011; Tyszka and Zielonka 2002).”
In the winning mood: Affect in the Iowa gambling task (2008, unknown): “making research (e.g., Betsch et al., 2003; Epstein, 1994; Evans, 2008; Hogarth, 2005;”