Brian S. Connelly

Clinical Psychology · 2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Brian S. Connelly trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Arthur Poropat
  2. L. M. Hough
  3. Murray R. Barrick
  4. Deniz S. Ones
  5. R. McCrae
  6. Colin G. DeYoung
  7. C. Viswesvaran
  8. T. Judge
  9. M. K. Mount
  10. Piers Steel

Who trusts Brian S. Connelly overall

  1. Arthur Poropat
  2. Patrick C. Kyllonen
  3. Amy E. Colbert
  4. C. Soto
  5. Dimitri van der Linden
  6. Youyou Wu
  7. T. Judge
  8. T. Cohen
  9. Jean M. Twenge
  10. Nicolas Roulin

Papers from Brian S. Connelly's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Brian S. Connelly trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?
  2. The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. (Psychological bulletin)
  3. The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology.
  4. What Do We Assess when We Assess a Big 5 Trait? A Content Analysis of the Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Processes Represented in Big 5 Personality Inventories
  5. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  6. A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. (Psychological bulletin)
  7. Consensual validation of personality traits across cultures
  8. Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment
  9. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  10. The Convergent Validity between Self and Observer Ratings of Personality: A Meta-Analytic Review

Their papers