Consensual validation of personality traits across cultures

By R. McCrae, Paul T. Costa, Thomas A. Martin, Valery E. Oryol, A. A. Rukavishnikov, I. Senin, M. Hřebíčková, T. Urbánek. 2004

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fb0325607c94acd1664c89b6aab8a9eb6a26905

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Human nature and culture: A trait perspective (2004, background): “Finally, a recent study extends the claim of universality to cross-observer agreement ( McCrae et al., in press ).”
Critique of the five-factor model of personality (2008, unknown): “Also there have been replications of the FFM using representative adjective samples from various languages (cf. Goldberg, 1992; McCrae & Allik, 2002; McCrae et al., 2004).”
Higher-order factors in a five-factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability (2007, background): “The five descriptive dimensions of personality have been replicated all over the world and new tests are continuously being developed (McCrae et al., 2004).”
Toward More Readable Big Five Personality Inventories (2006, result): “To conclude, the level of cross-observer agreement was fully comparable to the previous findings reported by McCrae et al. (2004), thus, demonstrating completely acceptable cross-observer validity of the EPIPNEO scales.”
Internal Consistency, Retest Reliability, and their Implications For Personality Scale Validity (2010, background): “Self/observer correlations were available for Russian (N = 800) and Czech (N = 714) samples (McCrae et al., 2004).”
An other perspective on personality: meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. (2010, methodology): “…the reference sections of existing meta-analyses and summary articles on other-ratings of personality (Connolly et al., 2007; Kenny et al., 1994; McCrae et al., 2004); (e) manually searching relevant existing meta-analytic databases; (f) contacting researchers who have frequently used…”
Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits (2015, background): “Even though personality traits cannot change but are innate predispositions that stabilise with time (McCrae et al., 2004), personality resources are considered to be one of the antecedents to occupational stress and have been shown to affect the coping mechanisms of the individual and the organisat”
Prospects for an integrated trait and cultural psychology (2009, methodology): “individuals in all cultures can describe their personality traits with at least some accuracy, using aggregate peer ratings as a comparison standard or criterion (Funder, 1995; McCrae et al., 2004).”
Implicit Theories and Self-Perceptions of Traitedness Across Cultures (2006, background): “This prediction follows from the evidence of universal and heritable trait dimensions, which can be observed with some accuracy in all cultures (McCrae et al., 2004).”
Personality-and-culture: The case of national extraversion and word-of-mouth (2006, methodology): “Money et al. (1998), noting that “(v)irtually no [previous] WOM studies have been undertaken on a cross-national basis” (p.”
On being yourself in different cultures: ideal and actual self-concept, autonomy support, and well-being in China, Russia, and the United States (2009, result): “The Big Five have emerged as perhaps the most reliable and universal way to measure individual differences in personality (John & Srivastava, 1999; McCrae & Costa, 2003), and considerable evidence has been amassed in support of the model’s cross-cultural validity (e.g., McCrae & Allik, 2002; McCrae ”
Personality profiles of cultures: aggregate personality traits. (2005, result): “German, Russian, and Czech data were taken from earlier studies (McCrae et al., 2004; Ostendorf & Angleitner, 2004), and portions of the Thai, Brazilian, and Lebanese data have also been reported in chapters in Costa and McCrae (in press), McCrae (in press), and McCrae, Terracciano, and Khoury (in p”
The NEO–PI–3: A More Readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory (2005, result): “Columns 8 and 9 of Table 3 report cross-observer correlations, which compare favorably to most studies using adults (cf. McCrae et al., 2004).”