The Convergent Validity between Self and Observer Ratings of Personality: A Meta-Analytic Review
By J. Connolly, Erin Kavanagh, C. Viswesvaran. 2007
332 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aec15ec835d1e95e92bce8667e99292f075a4362
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Willibald F. Ruch
- R. Proyer
- Marco Weber
- Christopher Peterson
- Nansook Park
- Claudia Buschor
- Brian S. Connelly
- Nicolas Roulin
In Social Psychology
- Willibald F. Ruch
- R. Proyer
- Claudia Buschor
- Marco Weber
- Nansook Park
- Christopher Peterson
- Nicolas Roulin
- V. Huta
Citations in the corpus
- Character strengths in children and adolescents: Reliability and initial validity of the german values in action inventory of strengths for youth (German VIA-Youth) (2014, background): “As Gillham et al. (2011) recently came up with a fivefactor solution it should be tested if this solution is replicable in German-speaking samples as well. Third, a parent-rating form will be generated. This form will be used to examine the convergent validity of the German VIA-Youth allowing the es”
- Self- and peer-rated character strengths: How do they relate to satisfaction with life and orientations to happiness? (2013, background): “This suggests that data from selfreports on strengths and life satisfaction do not seem to be biased by methodological problems (one data source; answer tendencies, response sets, etc.) – at least not to the same degree as has been found for other personality traits (see e.g. Connolly et al., 2007).”
- An other perspective on personality: meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. (2010, methodology): “A considerable amount of research has studied this question of the overlap between self- and other-ratings of personality traits, and some of this research has been summarized in a previous meta-analysis by Connolly et al. (2007). Connolly et al.”
- Self-Informant Agreement in Well-Being Ratings: A Meta-Analysis (2009, background): “A more substantive finding is that the validity of informant ratings increases with closeness to the target ( Connolly et al. 2007 ).”