D. A. Cook

Statistics and Probability · 2003–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 32 papers; trusts 26 researchers and is trusted by 17 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom D. A. Cook trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. David Merrill
  3. Scott B. Morris
  4. P. Lachenbruch
  5. W. McGaghie
  6. K. Anders Ericsson
  7. Roger L. Kneebone
  8. Darcy A. Reed
  9. David Moher
  10. S. Thompson

Who trusts D. A. Cook overall

  1. H. Mohajan
  2. C. Lashley
  3. Lasse Jensen
  4. Dr Krishna Regmi
  5. P. Erwin
  6. Ryan Brydges
  7. Marc M. Triola
  8. S. Hamstra
  9. F. Konradsen
  10. Ankur Joshi

Papers from D. A. Cook's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers D. A. Cook trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. (Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges)
  2. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
  3. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review (Medical Teacher)
  4. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
  5. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. (British medical journal)
  6. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity (Statistics in Medicine)
  7. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  8. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
  9. A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009 (Medical Education)
  10. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (Evidence report/technology assessment)

Their papers