A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009

By W. McGaghie, S. Issenberg, E. Petrusa, Ross J. Scalese. Medical Education, 2010

1,818 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education (2018, background): “Virtual learning simulations are practical and economical, and can supplement or be an alternative to real-life skills training (e.g. Herrmann-Werner et al. 2013; Issenberg 1999; McGaghie et al. 2010; Natioan Research Council 2011).”
Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99 (2015, positive): “This curriculum approach has proven effective (Kulik et al. 1990; McGaghie et al. 2010).”
Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016, background): “This, coupled with a plethora of instructional design features in simulation-based educational research, makes describing the simulation intervention a critically important component of any educational study involving simulation (Table 3) [6, 8, 19].”
Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2013, methodology): “This research will require progressively refined theories and conceptual frameworks that programmatically study carefully constructed questions (Bordage 2009; McGaghie et al. 2010).”