Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations

By Bridget C. O’Brien, Ilene B. Harris, T. Beckman, Darcy A. Reed, D. A. Cook. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2014

9,252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG) (2024, methodology): “Our view is that the problem of methodological inco-herence in (reflexive) thematic analysis reporting is not helped by the use of reporting checklists like COREQ 10 and SRQR, 11 which just over a third of the articles cited.”
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017, background): “5 Writing up the findings Guidance is available on writing up qualitative research [154], so here we focus on those aspects that may warrant particular consideration by COS developers.”
Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies (2017, methodology): “This iterative nature of the process should be made explicit (O’Brien et al., 2014).”
A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research (2019, background): “Limitations and issues of reflexivity and ethics are clearly and explicitly described, including references to actions taken to address these areas.(3,4,12,14)”